Science

Would that a life-extending course of treatment/care at less cost be promoted during a lifetime of awareness, at some point before and during the three years studied, there are likely ocassions that require more institutional care situations that rapidly evolve on which physicians may or may not make recommendations when requested, if indeed they are even advised about the incident, or based on best guess prognoses to caregivers themselves and their mental/physicial health requirements, that have higher costs -- in the end, those decisions may or may not be relevant to the initial patient living longer, but not in this study! Simply put, the stress of the living kills patient(s) and reduces both caregiver and patient's time left over and above the three years studied. Duh! They died! Likely the caregivers' health and longevity may have even been at risk leading to the studied patients demise.

Now, how much money was used up to study competent care at home or insistence on incompetent patient/caregiver choices at home? The paying programs already claw back 5 years of look-back. Those patients and their caregivers alike don't really know when their end(s) will come--tomorrow on the road to an appointment, a tumbling fall at home, failure to take a prescribed pill? Diet? Mental health lapses unreported in initimate settings? Lack of communication skills? Loving serene hugs won't change much! Hospice/palliative programs should make psychological exams mandatory! Costs are what they are in any future year; people make ackward choices. I think a "death benefit" for caregivers (when servicing as such at home for a patient) might be beneficially included in government programs(s), perhaps even free provided links to Go Fund Me requests for some griefing survivors.