Status of the Chemical Waste Drums (DDT) Dumped Off the Coast of Los Angeles County Decades Ago. [View all]
The paper to which I'll refer in this post is this one: Wide-Area Debris Field and Seabed Characterization of a Deep Ocean Dump Site Surveyed by Autonomous Underwater Vehicles Sophia T. Merrifield, Sean Celona, Ryan A. McCarthy, Andrew Pietruszka, Heidi Batchelor, Robert Hess, Andrew Nager, Raymond Young, Kurt Sadorf, Lisa A. Levin, David L. Valentine, James E. Conrad, and Eric J. Terrill Environmental Science & Technology 2023 57 (46), 18162-18171.
This issue of the scientific journal Environmental Science & Technology is largely devoted to the role of AI/machine learning as a tool in Environmental Science.
This particular paper is open to the public to read; no subscription is required.
These drums contain the now banned insecticide DDT, which is known to interfere with shell formation of birds; banning it was a major milestone in Environmental Law, which in this generation is decaying like the drums. They also contain oil refining residues from the many refineries in the LA area, in Torrance, El Segundo, and Wilmington.
The drums are off the coast of Palos Verdes (a wealthy enclave in LA county) in the San Pedro undersea basin, between Palos Verdes and Catalina Island.
My generation will leave the planet in much worse shape than we found it, as did the previous generation who dumped these drums, although on scale we easily exceeded: We used up the world's best ores but worse, rejected the only technology that might have prevented climate change.
Again, the paper is open sourced, but a few excerpts are in order:
Southern Californias coastal ocean hosts productive fisheries, is home to now protected ecosystems, and has an established tourism industry that is based on coastal recreation. Dump sites offshore California were established as early as the 1930s, became regulated in 1961, and were used for a variety of industrial purposes including disposal of waste from oil and gas production and the chemical manufacturing industry. Concern over these historical practices and their impact on the environment were described to the California Regional Water Quality Board in 1985. (5) The report documented extensive regulated dumping of a variety of bulk and containerized materials and the possibility of short-dumping, disposal prior to reaching the sanctioned dumping location. The San Pedro Basin, located in Southern California waters between Santa Catalina Island and Palos Verdes Peninsula at depths ranging from 600 to 900 m, was a dump site for military munitions (6) and a range of industrial wastes, including waste from refineries and chemical production. This included waste byproduct containing the pesticide dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), generated by the Montrose Chemical Corporation. Between 1947 and 1961, up to 700 t of DDT contained within acid sludge were dumped. (5) While only accounting for a small fraction of the total overall waste recorded as dumped, the DDT waste byproducts are of particular concern due to the long life of the chemical. DDT is now well understood to be both toxic and stable with long-lasting negative environmental impacts (7) including contamination of food webs, altering reproduction cycles, and contributing to cancer within wildlife. (8,9) As an endocrine disrupter and immune suppressor, recent studies have demonstrated human health linkages between DDT exposure from fish consumption and breast cancer in women that can be passed down through generations. (10) Interest is growing to develop a long-term strategy to assess the risk this dump site poses for both the surrounding marine ecosystem (11) and the coastal population of Southern California. To date, no systematic survey of the locations and conditions of the dump site has been conducted, due in part to the historical technical challenges associated with deep water survey. Although the presence of DDT in seafloor sediment samples has been recognized for decades, (12,13) it was only recently that surveys investigated whether barrels found on the seafloor could be a source. (14) Several studies have been published documenting the negative impacts of DDT to the marine food web in Southern California including birds, (15) dolphins, (9) and humans. (16)...
Graphics may be observed by opening the full article using the link.
I note, with some disgust, that the reason for dumping the drums with disregard for future generations was "economics." It was "cheap" to just dump the chemical waste drums in the ocean. The question of course, is "'cheap' for whom?" It's not cheap for us, this generation, it's a liability. Many pseudo-environmentalists - at least I attach the prefix "pseudo" to them - argue for example that solar cells and wind turbines are "cheap." Nevertheless, in less than 30 years, all of the wilderness rendered into industrial parks for this ineffective fantasy - if "effectiveness involved addressing the most serious environmental issue before us, climate change - will be largely chemical waste sites with rotting infrastructure. Of course, the decision by my awful generation to embrace this mass and land intensive garbage was never about climate change. It was about stopping the required growth of nuclear energy, which was our last best hope for a sustainable energy system. In this, the dangerous so called "renewable energy" fantasy was successful at entrenching the use of fossil fuels and preventing the growth of our last best hope for a sustainable world.
I'm given to platitudes and cliches in my writing these days, so I'll appeal to glass houses and throwing stones.
History will not forgive us, nor should it.
Have a nice weekend.
