Gun Control & RKBA

1- Training? I'd be okay with a training requirement but you do need a gun to train. I'd be okay with a prerequisite safety and law class as well.

2- Proficiency? At doing what? If you will be carrying, there should be licensing program that tests your proficiency, IMO.

3- Responsibility? IMO it should be the burden of a seller to provide a trigger or safety lock for the gun sold.


Pardon my sarcasm and hyperbole but Marines are paid to be Marines, follow orders through the chain of command from the National Military Command Center and abide by the UCMJ. I see no more relevance to living as a Marine than being paid to do so when not a Marine.


I guess you guess poorly.


I hear myself loud and clear. I am onboard with plenty of legal restrictions on guns. I don't really have much time to give a full description of the types of restrictions that I am and am not okay with. If you want to find an issue with me, I can point out that I think an AWB is pointless and a general registration requirement is a terrible idea.

Don't get me wrong. I'm happy that you decided to participate in the thread because that's what good Democrats do. We discuss and fairly debate. Finding reasons to shutdown discussion and rush a conclusion is Republican thing like the way they pushed Barrett into the SC.

I'm not offend nor shy. Hope to hear more from you.