Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

melm00se

(5,115 posts)
4. I disagree with the 1st link you posted
Tue Jan 14, 2020, 12:12 PM
Jan 2020

that effective control can only come from the federal government.

The needs and reasons for gun ownership are heavily local.

If you live in a rural area where you can (and do) run across predators and pests, a firearm is almost a necessity unless you want your livelihood wiped out. Living in an urban environment, the likelihood of waking up and finding a bear or fox or cougar or or or in your backyard are really really low so the reasons an urbanite for owning a gun are completely different.

The federal government takes the "one size fits all" approach to regulations and not everyone is the round peg fitting in the round hole.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»My theory: Gun control ad...»Reply #4