Gun Control & RKBA

ileus

(15,396 posts)

24. I notice stacks of the Surefire 60 or 90 round magazines in the leaked pics.

Wed Oct 4, 2017, 10:48 AM

Oct 2017

Don't know if there is a 90 round mag, but I know they have 60's, and believe there is a 90.

So dare I say bump stocks are ATF banned, and then I see "extended capacity" magazine ban coming up with other features thrown in for good measure.

Maybe the whole "assault weapons ban" revived.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

44 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Do you favor banning "bump stock" devices? (Which enable a semi-auto be used almost like an auto) [View all] CreekDog Oct 2017 OP

I feel like there should be a third (and maybe fourth) option better Oct 2017 #1

Bravo CreekDog Oct 2017 #3

I dunno about that... better Oct 2017 #4

Yes tortoise1956 Oct 2017 #2

And even beyond it not being unlimited... better Oct 2017 #5

I agree with part of your post... tortoise1956 Oct 2017 #6

A very fair point better Oct 2017 #7

tip your servers people! this kind of entertainment isn't free! CreekDog Oct 2017 #10

And your point is? tortoise1956 Oct 2017 #12

you don't seem to think it's ok to ban it simply on the basis of how fast and much it can fire CreekDog Oct 2017 #15

Why would you ban fully automatic weapons? tortoise1956 Oct 2017 #18

My point is extremely simple: he's trying to make his position sound thoughtful and reasonable CreekDog Oct 2017 #19

I'm ok going on record recommending banning these entirely. AtheistCrusader Oct 2017 #8

Thanks, AC tortoise1956 Oct 2017 #13

This would actually help a great deal with my retirement plans if they did. AtheistCrusader Oct 2017 #23

are you for real? CreekDog Oct 2017 #33

WTF is your problem? tortoise1956 Oct 2017 #35

Put them under NFA regulation. Straw Man Oct 2017 #9

if you vote yes in this poll, i'll eat my hat CreekDog Oct 2017 #11

Why would I vote "yes" to a total ban ... Straw Man Oct 2017 #20

Next up pistol braces... ileus Oct 2017 #14

Pistol braces don't give ARs more firepower... they just give them more stupidity. JoeStuckInOH Oct 2017 #17

I voted Yes discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2017 #16

Belt loops and sticks too Alea Oct 2017 #21

Your post reminded me of an old McGyver clip... yagotme Oct 2017 #22

Well there are youtube videos of people using rubber bands to bump fire. n/t PoliticAverse Oct 2017 #26

Yup. n/t yagotme Oct 2017 #29

I notice stacks of the Surefire 60 or 90 round magazines in the leaked pics. ileus Oct 2017 #24

The slide stock is only useful on guns with an external, detachable magazine. Kaleva Oct 2017 #25

At the VERY LEAST... Zoonart Oct 2017 #27

I favor banning ALL militaristic weaponry. Doreen Oct 2017 #28

ALL " militaristic weaponry" oneshooter Oct 2017 #31

I meant anything that has rapid fire. Doreen Oct 2017 #32

The Winchester M70 uses the same locking bolt action as the bottom rifle. oneshooter Oct 2017 #34

This is the "Mad Minute " drill 30 shots in 3 minutes or less oneshooter Oct 2017 #38

Does 24 aimed shots in under 15 seconds meet your definition of rapid fire? Lurks Often Oct 2017 #37

I'm not opposed or for such a ban. SomethingNew Oct 2017 #30

I'll join a few others and say I have no problem going on record in favor of banning these. Decoy of Fenris Oct 2017 #36

No. I won't even consider supporting any new HeartachesNhangovers Oct 2017 #39

I generally oppose the passage of ineffective legislation Kaleva Oct 2017 #40

Terms have meaning Always Right Oct 2017 #41

Ban? Kang Colby Oct 2017 #42

Of course you don't CreekDog Oct 2017 #44

Gun Related Research Survey cmhfnd Oct 2017 #43