Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

Showing Original Post only (View all)

tortoise1956

(671 posts)
Fri Jun 30, 2017, 01:29 AM Jun 2017

Ideas for the next Army battle rifle [View all]

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by krispos42 (a host of the Gun Control & RKBA group).

Since my last post about the Army search for a new battle rifle ended up crawling down the (white) rabbit hole, I'll try this one in the hope of hearing what others in this group believe would be a good choice. Mine first!

1. 6.5 Creedmoor - this bullet has an awesome BC. IIRC, a comparison of the 6.5 vs. the .308 shows that once the rounds reached about 800 yards, from then on the Creedmoor was carrying more energy than the .308. The 6.5 is noticeably lighter than the .308, which would allow the average G.I to carry more ammunition or the same number of rounds and have room for more stuff. To add to this, the Creedmoor has been shown to be accurate at ranges up to 1600 yards in the hands of an expert shooter.

2. 25-06 - very close to the 6.5 Creedmoor in most respects, this round would would make a good step up from the 5.56/.223. It has about 3 times he recoil of a 5.56 but 1.5 times as much muzzle energy. The only downside, to me, is that the Creedmoor carries significantly more energy at ranges outside 500 yards than the 25-06 in a smaller cartridge.

3. 6.5 Grendel - this was designed to be a longer range alternative to the 5.56, and it fulfills this role admirably. Like every other 6.5 round, the BC is pretty high, allowing it to be accurate at ranges up to 800 yards. All this in a pretty small case and with light recoil. IMHO, the size more than makes up for the reduction in energy.

4. 6.5x55 - my new favorite ever since I laid my hands on a 100+ year old Swedish Mauser, this cartridge has been proven in battle over and over since the Boer war in Africa. Ballistics-wise, it is almost identical to the 6.5 Creedmoor. However, the shell is a little longer, so once again weight becomes an issue. (It's more of a fond wish than a realistic choice, I'm afraid...DAMNIT!)

So there it is. If I had to decide, I would probably go with the Creedmoor or the Grendel. If it was the Grendel, I would include a select-fire option. The other cartridges would be limited to Semi-auto fire only.

What say you?

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Ideas for the next Army b...»Reply #0