Gun Control & RKBA

beevul: In general, if one group has more intensity, they vote more, than a group with relatively low intensity who doesn't, the result isn't 'bogus', its a reflection of the sad reality of the side of the issue that you are on

That is one of the stupidest interpretations of the accuracy of internet polling I've ever read. No surprise to me it comes from you.
Your reasoning above would be valid at a reputable regulated poll, but utterly invalid for an unregulated internet poll, where people can vote as many computers or screen names as they possess. You are losing this thread as worse as ever, with every post you make.

beevul: I can see how you'd prefer to characterize it as 'bogus' though to preserve the illusion.

Here you are indeed defending the bogus poll, the junk science garbage which you posted in an OP.
Now I can justifiably lump you in with sarisatka, the odd named 'just reading posts', & teddyR, as making fools of yourselves by defending this unscientific concealed carry internet gun poll.
(Note: Not to infer I didn't think you a fool previously.)

I previously wrote: even though you were apparently glowing with satisfaction over posting fraudulent poll results.
beevul: So your answer is a 'I didn't do it' note, in which you continue to do it

As pathetic from you as usual. Try to bedazzle readers with irrational BS rather than any reasoned argument.
Now I can even remove the word 'apparently' - which disproves your claim in itself - since you have now defended the bogus poll by your comment just above, denying it as bogus. You are indeed glowing over fraudulent poll results.

beevul prior post: All I said was that the result was interesting.

You can't say that any longer. You contend that the poll is NOT bogus:
beevul wrote: I can see how you'd prefer to characterize it as 'bogus' though to preserve the illusion.

beevul: I was thinking it demonstrates the fanatical anti-gunner and how they tend to have nothing good to say when it comes to responding to anything remotely pro-gun, up to and including attempting to falsely attribute viewpoints to others, that they have not expressed about this poll. Your interaction and comments about me alone in this thread are factual proof for all to see.

Getting under your skin am I? good, it's nice to see truth twisting con artists (like donald trump) squirm away while attempting to extricate themselves from their own stupidity.

Did you even read what other posters said after I checked you? Seems you are spitting in the wind, or rather BS'g into it.

tortoise: He didn't say it was a scientific poll, just that the results were interesting... But I agree with you that there's nothing remotely scientific about this poll.

sariakta: My first question was rather tongue in cheek, I am familiar with how internet polls work.