Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

theatre goon

(87 posts)
10. So, if one were to accept your assertions...
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 02:19 PM
Mar 2016

...assertions which you have not actually proven, by the way, with a couple of anecdotes -- then just because a crime is difficult to prove, then we can assume people are guilty of that crime, even if it has not been proven?

No, thanks -- I'm a firm believer in punishing only those who have been proven guilty, not assumed guilty because that guilt can't actually be proven.

If a gun dealer can be shown to be breaking the law, then they should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law -- the PLCAA does not prevent that. If they have not broken any laws, then they should be allowed to carry on conducting their business within the law. Pretty simple stuff, when one can overlook any personal biases they might have.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Gun Store Owner Refuses t...»Reply #10