Welcome to DU!
    The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
    Join the community:
    Create a free account
    Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
    Become a Star Member
    Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
    All Forums
        Issue Forums
        Culture Forums
        Alliance Forums
        Region Forums
        Support Forums
        Help & Search
    
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Mandatory gun insurance before lawmakers in 4 states [View all]Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)15. That's a pretty bold misrepresentation, particularly in context of your OP claiming
        there's a need for liability insurance. 
You hate the idea of safety training because that would undermine your desire to tax people out of their rights.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
  Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
						
							54 replies
							
								 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
					
                    
					
                     = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
					
                    
					
        
        Well, that's nice. Now I'll have to buy insurance to cover a gun I've owned since 1988.
        In_The_Wind
        Feb 2016
        #1
      
        
        I've never seen any literature from the NRA's "Guns for Everyone" campaign. Do you have any links?
        Nuclear Unicorn
        Feb 2016
        #6
      
        
        That's a pretty bold misrepresentation, particularly in context of your OP claiming
        Nuclear Unicorn
        Feb 2016
        #15
      
        
        No, Duckhunter935, it is not.  However if it is operated on public property it is.
        flamin lib
        Feb 2016
        #31
      
        
        Well, Duckhunter935, you know full well that the purpose of auto insurance isn't to
        flamin lib
        Feb 2016
        #32
      
        
        Seeing as you are a gun dealer, I have a couple of questions about insurance for you:
        friendly_iconoclast
        Feb 2016
        #41
      
        
        Since our self-declared gun dealer interlocutor has also stated that they hate the PLCAA...
        friendly_iconoclast
        Feb 2016
        #46
      
        
        Not really, it's more to illustrate how the controllers fold when things get tough
        friendly_iconoclast
        Feb 2016
        #48
      
        
        To clarify, a C&R FFL does NOT authorize the holder to operate a firearms business
        Marengo
        Feb 2016
        #49
      
        
        He would still most likely have insurance, as his collection has monetary value
        friendly_iconoclast
        Feb 2016
        #50
      
        
        Religious types don't change their behavior when confronted with empirical evidence
        friendly_iconoclast
        Feb 2016
        #42
      
        
        Ah, means-testing to discourage the working class and minorities from owning guns.
        benEzra
        Feb 2016
        #54
      
  