Gun Control & RKBA

I've never seen that argument made by 'the gun lobby' or more specifically, the nra.

All I see, is someone claiming, with zero evidence provided, that it happened.




How can it be done, so that a 'stolen gun' can be remotely deactivated, while lawfully owned guns can not?

Like it or not, that's a legitimate concern, and its not going to go away. I wouldn't want some asshat criminal remotely disabling someones smart gun, similar to how hackers have hacked into numerous auto operating systems. Again, that's a legitimate concern.

I bet if we asked the author, he would still insist that private sales of firearms are a huge problem, in spite of claiming that stolen guns "fuel much if not most violent street crime".





Another very specific claim about the nra, with zero evidence provided.




Its not demonstrably proven wrong anywhere in this OPINION piece. Its also never proven that the results of the NSSF survey was never credible. The author as much as admits it, when he says "never credible" and then admits in the next sentence that at the very least theres a "very remote chance".

More people are against gun control now than before all these mass shootings the author cites, so that talking point was a falsehood.

And smartphones and GPS have shown the people that actually USE them, that they're less than 100 percent reliable for regular duty, let alone if ones life is on the line. Another talking point deconstructed.



Pay close attention folks. The "this" in the above paragraph refers to all the falsehoods contained in the previous paragraph. Yes, it really does. Unbelievable huh?



Another strawman. The argument is not that "they will soon be mandated". The argument IS that mandating them has already been done, and the intentions behind it are clear. See NJ. Oh, and 'perverse'? The author needs to sit down and read the cheerleading replies from our anti-gun friends about "the right people" being killed by guns, if he wants to see perverse.