Welcome to DU!
    The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
    Join the community:
    Create a free account
    Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
    Become a Star Member
    Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
    All Forums
        Issue Forums
        Culture Forums
        Alliance Forums
        Region Forums
        Support Forums
        Help & Search
    
Gun Control & RKBA
Showing Original Post only (View all)NRA lies smartly exposed: The truth about consumer demand for life-saving smart guns [View all]
 A new national survey by an esteemed team of public-health researchers takes dead aim at one of the gun lobbys worst lies among too many to count: That theres just no market for smarter guns that would save lives.
Sane people up to and including President Obama understand that equipping guns with technology that lets them fire only in the hands of rightful owners would cut firearm fatalities.
Plus, the ability to remotely disable a stolen weapon would surely reduce gun thefts  which happen more than 200,000 times a year, fuel much if not most violent street crime and also create new business for gun manufacturers.
The National Rifle Association has long insisted that Americans have no interest in smart-gun technology. Still more, the NRAs vigorous opposition has cowed gun sellers from marketing such weaponry in fear that the association would otherwise drive them out of business.
http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/nra-lies-smartly-exposed-article-1.2506721
Sane people up to and including President Obama understand that equipping guns with technology that lets them fire only in the hands of rightful owners would cut firearm fatalities.
Plus, the ability to remotely disable a stolen weapon would surely reduce gun thefts  which happen more than 200,000 times a year, fuel much if not most violent street crime and also create new business for gun manufacturers.
The National Rifle Association has long insisted that Americans have no interest in smart-gun technology. Still more, the NRAs vigorous opposition has cowed gun sellers from marketing such weaponry in fear that the association would otherwise drive them out of business.
http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/nra-lies-smartly-exposed-article-1.2506721
						
							85 replies
							
								 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
					
                    
					
                     = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
					
                    
					
                        NRA lies smartly exposed: The truth about consumer demand for life-saving smart guns [View all]
							SecularMotion
							Jan 2016
							OP
                        
        
        But how can I use my gun against the gubmint jackboots if they can turn it off????
        Human101948
        Jan 2016
        #1
      
        
        Not all government oppressors wear jackboots. Some wore white bedsheets and hoods.
        Nuclear Unicorn
        Jan 2016
        #3
      
        
        Interesting video- but most   'stupid' guns are very reliable these days,...
        friendly_iconoclast
        Feb 2016
        #64
      
        
        The Mossberg technology works at 2 to 5 inches, has passed mil spec testing and is under testing for
        flamin lib
        Feb 2016
        #67
      
        
        Most gun rights supporters don't oppose the technology or further research per se.
        branford
        Feb 2016
        #68
      
        
        Moving the goal posts while doing everything possible to prevent the technology from
        flamin lib
        Feb 2016
        #69
      
        
        Passing mil spec does not equal proven and reliable, no less for all lawful civilian purposes.
        branford
        Feb 2016
        #74
      
        
        Considering your vehemence that these guns be accepted wholesale and in large quantities...
        krispos42
        Feb 2016
        #80
      
        
        As a firearm owner I will not buy one of these smart. Firearms are simple tools, that is why they
        Waldorf
        Jan 2016
        #24
      
        
        I've visited that group a couple times. I could swear I saw a couple tumbleweeds blowing about.
        Waldorf
        Jan 2016
        #44
      
        
        I think the strongest ticket for the Democratic Party would be Clinton-Castro
        SecularMotion
        Jan 2016
        #46
      
        
        So it appears you do agree that they are less reliable than todays firearms and more expensive. :)
        Waldorf
        Jan 2016
        #42