Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pablo_marmol

(2,375 posts)
17. ^^ Two points:
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 07:46 AM
Jan 2016

1) Your response to a thoughtful, intelligent and honest post is a one line non-sequiter? Well, at least you're consistently thoughtless!

2) A person of integrity would like to know more about the source of the OP's post if, and only if they had thoroughly checked the (abundant) citations in the article and found them lacking. A person such as yourself, on the other hand, would "like to know more about the source of the OP's post" in order to haplessly "debunk" the material by employing the genetic fallacy.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Attorney General Harris -...»Reply #17