Welcome to DU!
    The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
    Join the community:
    Create a free account
    Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
    Become a Star Member
    Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
    All Forums
        Issue Forums
        Culture Forums
        Alliance Forums
        Region Forums
        Support Forums
        Help & Search
    
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Weapons common on Oregon college campus despite 'gun-free zone' [View all]Lurks Often
(5,455 posts)17. That is exactly what you meant
        The post you responded to explained that people with a CCW were allowed to carry on campus despite the "gun free zone" and that the worst they would face would be trespassing charges.
Your response was "That should be changed. No reason to coddle terrorists on university campuses".  That response tells me that you think people with CCW permits are terrorists.  If that isn't what you meant you need to do a far better job of phrasing your comments.
It is absurd and stupid to think a person willing to murder multiple people and commit suicide is going to all of sudden going to stop what they have planned just because there is a law against having a gun in a "gun free zone".
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
  Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
						
							70 replies
							
								 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
					
                    
					
                     = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
					
                    
					
        
        It was a video, not a tweet- but she still said it *and you know it, as you replied to it*:
        friendly_iconoclast
        Oct 2015
        #42
      
        
        Also, Shannon Watts is demonstrated liar and a poor excuse for a Democrat...
        friendly_iconoclast
        Oct 2015
        #43
      
        
        I believe my examples met your criteria. Whether *you* agree or disagree is not my concern n/t
        friendly_iconoclast
        Oct 2015
        #54
      
        
        Shannon Watts is a proven liar and a piss-poor excuse for a Democrat
        friendly_iconoclast
        Oct 2015
        #51
      
        
        Don't take the shouting and handwaving too much to heart- we're dealing with a version of these:
        friendly_iconoclast
        Oct 2015
        #61
      
        
        Respectfully, carrying a weapon is for self-defense, not strategic law enforcement...
        Eleanors38
        Oct 2015
        #8
      
        
        I believe one of gejohnston's graphics best describes the situation:
        friendly_iconoclast
        Oct 2015
        #58
      
        
        That should be changed. No reason to coddle terrorists on university campuses.
        stone space
        Oct 2015
        #9