Gun Control & RKBA

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,669 posts)

8. That's a negative, you're just wrong

Reply to eridani (Original post)

Mon Oct 5, 2015, 11:54 AM

Oct 2015

Consider:

In pari materia ("upon the same matter or subject&quot

When a statute is ambiguous, its meaning may be determined in light of other statutes on the same subject matter.

"THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its (the federal government's) powers, that further declaratory and restrictive (of the government) clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution."

(underlined text added by me)

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

24 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Second Amendment Is a Gun-Control Amendment [View all] eridani Oct 2015 OP

Almost EdwardBernays Oct 2015 #1

actually not, gejohnston Oct 2015 #6

a zeal to deceive jimmy the one Oct 2015 #13

I know exactly what I'm talking about gejohnston Oct 2015 #15

a blue link still needs explanation jimmy the one Oct 2015 #17

the reason I ignored the collective right gejohnston Oct 2015 #18

what kind of error was it jimmy the one Oct 2015 #20

stupid ol' supreme court jimmy the one Oct 2015 #19

printz and miller were both criminals gejohnston Oct 2015 #21

non responsive jimmy the one Oct 2015 #23

non responsive is gejohnston Oct 2015 #24

The U.S. Constitution doesn't do "collective rights." Rights are individual. Eleanors38 Oct 2015 #9

The right to life, liberty, and persuit of happiness is where firearm ownership comes from. ileus Oct 2015 #2

The "pursuit of happiness" does not necessarily equate with "happiness is a warm gun" Human101948 Oct 2015 #3

A right to life implies a right to self-defense discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2015 #4

It is the mode of self defense that is in dispute... Human101948 Oct 2015 #5

File with ATF... discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2015 #7

That's a negative, you're just wrong discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2015 #8

That paragraph essentially destroys interpretation out of context... beevul Oct 2015 #10

Absolutely!!! discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2015 #11

the invisible word - declaratory jimmy the one Oct 2015 #12

the Bill of Rights... discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2015 #14

declaratory & (govt) restrictive jimmy the one Oct 2015 #22

Of course it isn't, james. beevul Oct 2015 #16