Welcome to DU!
    The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
    Join the community:
    Create a free account
    Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
    Become a Star Member
    Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
    All Forums
        Issue Forums
        Culture Forums
        Alliance Forums
        Region Forums
        Support Forums
        Help & Search
    
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: If you ever wondered what Skinner thought about pro-gun posts [View all]We really need to admit that we have a gun violence culture that does not exist in other countries. 
Can we also admit that this culture you refer to is comprised by less than a tenth of a percent of those who own guns?
It is as if we are to accept gun violence as a given rather then do anything to try and control guns in this country because of the 2nd Amendment.
That's based on the premise that gun control is the only answer. Do you really think it is the only answer?
The problem as I see it is in the Supreme Court's interpretation of the meaning of the 2nd Amendment. 
I do not agree that the 2nd Amendment conveys the right to keep and bear arms in the abstract.
I do not agree that the 2nd Amendment conveys the right to keep and bear arms in the abstract.
And yet, amendment 2 restricts only government, not individuals. It can not convey or grant any rights. It can only protect them.
My vision is that everyone in this country, gun owners and non gun owners would agree that we can't keep ignoring the gun violence problem we have.
I think everyone already agrees with this. The 99.9x percent of gun owners that aren't committing any gun violence, however, do not appreciate it being laid at their feet as if they are the problem.
Because they aren't.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
  Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
						
							37 replies
							
								 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
					
                    
					
                     = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
					
                    
					
        
        We have a small but vocal contingent that come here to tell us we don't belong on DU
        hack89
        Sep 2015
        #2
      
        
        And the 2016 Presidential looks to be shaping up like 2014 because the presumed candidate has -57%
        leveymg
        Sep 2015
        #27
      
        
        Yup, if they have their way, that's the model to follow - but without the nice furniture
        DonP
        Sep 2015
        #21