Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(66,601 posts)
2. Start by combining a UK-style Online Safety Act with Project 2025's definition of "harmful content."
Sun Nov 16, 2025, 02:16 PM
Sunday

Not only demand that all potentially "harmful" sites require government IDs under penalty of substantial fines, but also require them to blacklist known VPN IP addresses. Sites affected by the UK act include Wikipedia (which sued and lost), Spotify, Reddit and 4chan (UK is trying to fine them).
The UK also forbids website operators from even recommending VPNs.

In addition to the known IP blocks, a really stupid government might compel deep packet inspection or AI-driven analysis to sniff out suspected VPN traffic. Then there's Russia, where VPN use counts as an aggravating factor in criminal access to forbidden sites.

Don't rule out going full authoritarian and block non-compliant sites at the ISP level.


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Civil Liberties»Wisconsin: Lawmakers Want...»Reply #2