Welcome to DU!
    The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
    Join the community:
    Create a free account
    Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
    Become a Star Member
    Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
    All Forums
        Issue Forums
        Culture Forums
        Alliance Forums
        Region Forums
        Support Forums
        Help & Search
    
Feminists
In reply to the discussion: fresh thread. i purpose that the sop gender issue is moved down [View all]iverglas
(38,549 posts)16. it was intended to be exclusionary
        It was intended to exclude the self-described feminists who had persistently and concertedly attacked women/feminists in this forum, both in this forum and elsewhere, to stifle discussions of the problems associated with pornography / prostitution / the objectification of women, and who continue to do so to this week.
I see you have been a member here for one month. I say this not to discredit you, but to point out that you are not to be expected to have any knowledge of that history, unless someone informs you.
I note that you were posting in the beauty pageant thread, and that when someone posted, in reply to a post of yours:
Maybe if everything in the world wasn't sexism to a few people around here...But you're going to get this shit every time a post talks about anything to do with women and something even REMOTELY sexual. Because we have social conservative puritans here who just love to pounce on it.
you said nothing in reply. You allowed that vicious mischaracterization of long-time members of this group here, Feminists, and of other women at DU, to stand unchallenged. I would not have taken it from other things that you said that you agreed with it. I hope I am right in making that assumption.
Your posts in the subsequent threads in LGBT, however, do not inspire my confidence. I have no idea why you would speculate, for example, about the nature of PMs sent by me about which you knew nothing.
I have little doubt that the previous problems will recur in this group if the group does not make it clear that the posters in question are not welcome, and their kind of discourse is not welcome.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
  Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
						
							64 replies
							
								
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
					
                    
					
                    
        
        thanks justice.  and does it feel good to move down, or does that not bother you.
        seabeyond
        Jan 2012
        #5
      
        
        I also think it should read "feminist perspective," not "woman's perspective."  nt
        BlueIris
        Jan 2012
        #8
      
        
        I hope that members who didn't comment on the previous thread will comment here.
        Gormy Cuss
        Jan 2012
        #9
      
        
        over 7 yrs on du and this move to du3 and more open attack, i would prefer a bullet.
        seabeyond
        Jan 2012
        #22
      
        
        i dont want anyone banned.  and the temptation will be too great, i assure you.  people cannot help
        seabeyond
        Jan 2012
        #27
      
        
        is it really that hard not to call other women names when discussing an issue?  nt
        seabeyond
        Jan 2012
        #31
      
        
        grinnin.  you never disappoint.  if it is not hard to not call names, then none of us
        seabeyond
        Jan 2012
        #33
      
        
        i dont put people on ignore.  and i dont have a problem with your posts. yes, you talked to someone 
        seabeyond
        Jan 2012
        #35
      
        
        My other posts in Feminists must have fallen pray to the old Deleted Subthread.
        LeftyMom
        Jan 2012
        #42
      
        
        all of the bullets can be considered exclusionary.  that is the purpose of them
        seabeyond
        Jan 2012
        #23
      
        
        what are you suggesting.  i am all for the discussion.  i am not into having someone tell me i am a 
        seabeyond
        Jan 2012
        #47
      
        
        I think she's saying no name calling, just exchanging ideas with no minimizing or insults
        redqueen
        Jan 2012
        #48
      
        
        that is fine.  adding a bit.  the bit where it says... if discussing porn no name calling like
        seabeyond
        Jan 2012
        #52
      
        
        bunny and i are not on the same side.  we often disagree, lol.  hey bunny, good to see you in here.
        seabeyond
        Jan 2012
        #24
      
        
        raisin hand...  is anyone gonna get to call me (ready?), prude, pearl clutcher, frigid, anti sex, 
        seabeyond
        Jan 2012
        #60
      
        
        No, I expect all the co-hosts will agree that such namecalling is unacceptable.
        redqueen
        Jan 2012
        #61