Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Feminists
In reply to the discussion: More public schools splitting up boys, girls [View all]lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)11. Schools can't do anything about socioeconomic status of the families living in the district.
It's pointless to worry about it. At worst, it simply becomes an excuse to do badly.
In contrast, single sex classrooms is an actionable idea.
From your link
Foley, population 11,300, is 10 miles from the Gulf Coast. Fifty-seven percent of Foley Intermediates students are white, 24 percent are black and 17 percent are Latino; 70 percent receive free or reduced-price lunches each day. In the first year of Foleys single-sex program, a third of the kids enrolled. The next year, two-thirds signed up, and in its third year 87 percent of parents requested the program. Principal Mansell reports that her single-sex classes produce fewer discipline problems, more parental support and better scores in writing, reading and math. She does, however, acknowledge that her data are compromised, as her highest-performing teachers and her most-motivated students have chosen single-sex.
...
Wylie says she believes she is a better teacher, and her students are better students, because theyre in a desexualized or at least less-sexualized environment. Sure, she says, when they take pictures, they often present their backsides first. But I think Im giving girls a better education than I could have if there were guys in the room. Im freer. Im more able to be bold in my statements. When I teach poetry and I talk about the sex in poetry I dont need to be worried about the boy in the room who is going to chuckle over the thing he did with the girl last week and embarrass her. Which happened more than once in my last coed environment.
Nearly everyone at T.Y.W.L.S. acknowledges that often parents most pressing concern when enrolling their 11-year-old daughters is sheltering those girls from sexualized classrooms and sexualized streets. Harlems a very intense environment, says Drew Higginbotham, T.Y.W.L.S.s assistant principal, who lives in the neighborhood. Youre constantly needing to prove yourself physically, to prove yourself sexually. Parents, when they come to our school, they sort of exhale deeply. You can hear them thinking to themselves, I can see my daughter here and shes going to be O.K. for six hours a day. Sax is not above or beyond this kind of thinking, either. In fact, after a nearly-two-hour conversation filled with scientific jargon and brains, he told me, perhaps wishfully, that really the most important reason to send a child to a single-sex high school was that those kids still go on dates. Boys at boys schools like Old Farms in Connecticut, or Saint Albans in Washington, D. C., will call up girls at Miss Porters in Connecticut, at Stone Ridge in Maryland, and they will ask the girl out, and the boy will drive to the girls house to pick her up and meet her parents. You tell kids at a coed school to do this, and theyll fall on the floor laughing. But the culture of dating is much healthier than the culture of the hookup, in which the primary form of sexual intimacy is a girl on her knees servicing a boy.
...
Wylie says she believes she is a better teacher, and her students are better students, because theyre in a desexualized or at least less-sexualized environment. Sure, she says, when they take pictures, they often present their backsides first. But I think Im giving girls a better education than I could have if there were guys in the room. Im freer. Im more able to be bold in my statements. When I teach poetry and I talk about the sex in poetry I dont need to be worried about the boy in the room who is going to chuckle over the thing he did with the girl last week and embarrass her. Which happened more than once in my last coed environment.
Nearly everyone at T.Y.W.L.S. acknowledges that often parents most pressing concern when enrolling their 11-year-old daughters is sheltering those girls from sexualized classrooms and sexualized streets. Harlems a very intense environment, says Drew Higginbotham, T.Y.W.L.S.s assistant principal, who lives in the neighborhood. Youre constantly needing to prove yourself physically, to prove yourself sexually. Parents, when they come to our school, they sort of exhale deeply. You can hear them thinking to themselves, I can see my daughter here and shes going to be O.K. for six hours a day. Sax is not above or beyond this kind of thinking, either. In fact, after a nearly-two-hour conversation filled with scientific jargon and brains, he told me, perhaps wishfully, that really the most important reason to send a child to a single-sex high school was that those kids still go on dates. Boys at boys schools like Old Farms in Connecticut, or Saint Albans in Washington, D. C., will call up girls at Miss Porters in Connecticut, at Stone Ridge in Maryland, and they will ask the girl out, and the boy will drive to the girls house to pick her up and meet her parents. You tell kids at a coed school to do this, and theyll fall on the floor laughing. But the culture of dating is much healthier than the culture of the hookup, in which the primary form of sexual intimacy is a girl on her knees servicing a boy.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
34 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

More on the studies of Leonard Sax, the web owner of Single Sex Schools-
Starry Messenger
Jul 2012
#5
The feminist case for SS classrooms is that is has been shown to increase girls test scores 30%.
lumberjack_jeff
Jul 2012
#8
Schools can't do anything about socioeconomic status of the families living in the district.
lumberjack_jeff
Jul 2012
#11
Parents who choose schools are defacto more involved in their children's education.
Starry Messenger
Jul 2012
#14
The "why" matters, else it's hard to ascribe the outcome to the intervention.
Gormy Cuss
Jul 2012
#22
In this case, both the blue eyed and brown eyed students tested better.
lumberjack_jeff
Jul 2012
#23
You missed the point about eye color but bias is one way that data can be corrupted.
Gormy Cuss
Jul 2012
#24
Do banks issue Mortgages based upon gender or income, payment histories etc?
One_Life_To_Give
Jul 2012
#21