Welcome to DU!
    The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
    Join the community:
    Create a free account
    Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
    Become a Star Member
    Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
    All Forums
        Issue Forums
        Culture Forums
        Alliance Forums
        Region Forums
        Support Forums
        Help & Search
    
Feminists
In reply to the discussion: Sexist language that I personally cannot stand [View all]longship
(40,416 posts)21. History is what it is
        Herstory is a stupid coinage. It basically claims that history is deliberately skewed to report only about males. Either that, or that women are so unimportant in history there needs to be a special herstory.
The first is clearly not true. And I don't think anybody would claim the second.
If women are misrepresented in history, the solution is to fix it, not making a special herstory, forever separate.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
  Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
						
							58 replies
							
								
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
					
                    
					
                    
        
        If its asked by your boss, you may have an actionable legal complaint.
        Warren DeMontague
        Jun 2012
        #41
      
        
        i don't like that english doesn't have a third party singular alive-but-unspecified-gender pronoun.
        unblock
        Jun 2012
        #5
      
        
        I tend to use male/female because not all males are men and not all females are women.
        laconicsax
        Jun 2012
        #30