Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Creative Speculation

wildbilln864

(13,382 posts)

2. nice try seger(not really) but you

Reply to William Seger (Reply #1)

Thu Sep 4, 2014, 08:20 PM

Sep 2014

failed again! You have yet to explain the molten steel under the world trade center buildings. Oh yes that's right you can't so you deny it even existed. LOL! And you weren't even there but you'll still pretend you know more than actual eyewitnesses, and chemists, metalurgists, physicists and structural engineers. The Dunning-Kruger is so very strong with you. Thanks again for the laugh.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

David Topete, MSCE, S.E. [View all] wildbilln864 Sep 2014 OP

And another "I don't understand this" argument William Seger Sep 2014 #1

nice try seger(not really) but you wildbilln864 Sep 2014 #2