Creative Speculation
In reply to the discussion: Why no mention of WTC Building 7 in 911 Commission Report? [View all]superbeachnut
(381 posts)Max Cleland, let me guess, a democrat? lol, you fall for the show and fail to understand the FBI did the criminal investigation, and thus you missed it was 19 terrorists in 4 aircraft in NYC, DC and PA. Where have you been, googling 911 and finding woo.
lol, you found out the NORAD guys who testified had the wrong numbers? times? lol, guess who set them up, their peers. When you get higher in rank your peers become your buddies who are trying to rise in rank, and leave their peers at LtCol and Col - I bet the NORAD guys were set up by their peers or fellow officers - but the NORAD testifying errors don't make a difference or help your fantasy version of 911. The fantasy version of 911 you can't define, explain or support with facts.
You found politics and can't explain how it helps your inside job failed claims and fantasy version of 911 -given 13 years.
13 years and repeating nonsense that means nothing for your fantasy - you need evidence, not party politics and BS.
Congress does money, not crime - and if they want to say they failed, what is new. I can't believe those nuts claim failure, thus they are saying they failed. Irony, or stupidity, our congress in action, or inaction - like 911 truth; but 911 truth has 13 solid years of failure, with no end insight, a lock on eternal failure - keep up the good work.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):