Creative Speculation
In reply to the discussion: Why no mention of WTC Building 7 in 911 Commission Report? [View all]superbeachnut
(381 posts)Night time fires look bad.
One Meridian Plaza, fires fought, yet One Meridian Plaza never used again, like WTC 7. oops
Your photo of One Meridian Plaza shows what WTC 7 never got - water - why do you debunk yourself?
Makes zero sense to post One Meridian Plaza, the building suffered massive damage, and the "thermal explansion", oh man.
Why post BS when you are debunking yourself.
http://www.usfa.fema.gov/downloads/pdf/publications/tr-049.pdf
Oops, never used again, totaled by fires fought - does not help your fantasy.
I love this photo, as it shows what office fires do, even office fires fought.
WTC 7 fires not fought, known before it collapsed, it would never be used again. Fire destroys buildings, 911 truth can't comprehend fire science. 13 years of BS, top off with being stuck in Creative Speculation because fantasy is not news.
Then you show Windsor Building in Spain, where the steel only part failed in an hour or two - OOPS
Windsor fire, was fought, and it stood because it had a concrete core - the WTC 7 has more concrete in it's core; lessons learned.
Once again you post a building never used again.
Got any highrise fires not fought?
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):