Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Creative Speculation
In reply to the discussion: Face with a name [View all]superbeachnut
(381 posts)24. Jeff Latas analysis is based on failed knowledge
Jeff Latas, no clue what happened on 911, in ignorance for 13 years supporting lies from 911 truth.
Essentially it would have been too high at that point to the point of impact where the main body of the airplane was hitting between the first and second floor of the Pentagon. - Jeff LatasDid Jeff Latas inspire pilots for truth false claims? Is Jeff Latas made up nonsense, all done with no study, inspiration for pilots for truth to spread lies? Is this the pilot for truth method? Get fake experts, list their credentials, then quote mine them to support fantasy claims. The FDR shows 77 was not too high, witnesses saw 77 impact the Pentagon. Jeff Latas is wrong, and has no evidence, no analysis to support his fantasy.
But, you know, that kind of descent rate it would have been impossible essentially for the results that we see physically from what the flight data recorder was recording. Like I say, that's an area that I think deserves explanation. ... - Jeff Latas
Jeff, the Flight Data Recorder (FDR) shows the descent rate was possible, in fact Jeff, the FDR shows what happened. Jeff Latas has no clue how to comprehend FDR information, and ignores witnesses. Jeff Latas is calling those who saw 77 hit the Pentagon, his fellow Americans, liars by saying this claptrap. Why is Jeff Latas unable to figure out 911, and why is he acting like a paranoid conspiracy theorist, supporting pilots for truth lies.
And I can't think of all the discrepancies I saw, but there are several there. - Jeff LatasJeff Latas "can't think of all the discrepancies" because Jeff Latas is ignorant on the details, evidence, and what happened on 911. Jeff Latas, another BS artist on 911, spreading dumbed down claptrap he calls discrepancies.
After I did my own analysis ... - Jeff Latas
Where is Jeff Latas fantasy analysis posted? Is it similar to 11.2g, or 34g? Does it include a fake Vg diagram. Is it the impossible speed lie analysis.
Will Jeffery Lynn Latas publish his analysis, or is Jeff's analysis BS, big talk from pilot who can't take the time to do research.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
31 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

pilots for truth faces to go with the fringe conspiracy theorists spreading lies of impossible speed
superbeachnut
Jun 2014
#7
Faces which spread lies about 911 - unable to hit targets terrorists hit - pilots for truth
superbeachnut
Jun 2014
#11
Your 11.2g failed math is classic, never gets old, you still have it posted
superbeachnut
Jun 2014
#18
FYI, it is not appropriate on DU to demand fellow members to reveal their real names and pictures.
stevenleser
Jun 2014
#26
I use my real name because politics is my business and I want to encourage name recognition.
stevenleser
Jul 2014
#30