Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Creative Speculation

In reply to the discussion: Face with a name [View all]

superbeachnut

(381 posts)
24. Jeff Latas analysis is based on failed knowledge
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 02:43 PM
Jun 2014

Jeff Latas, no clue what happened on 911, in ignorance for 13 years supporting lies from 911 truth.

Essentially it would have been too high at that point to the point of impact where the main body of the airplane was hitting between the first and second floor of the Pentagon. - Jeff Latas
Did Jeff Latas inspire pilots for truth false claims? Is Jeff Latas made up nonsense, all done with no study, inspiration for pilots for truth to spread lies? Is this the pilot for truth method? Get fake experts, list their credentials, then quote mine them to support fantasy claims. The FDR shows 77 was not too high, witnesses saw 77 impact the Pentagon. Jeff Latas is wrong, and has no evidence, no analysis to support his fantasy.

But, you know, that kind of descent rate it would have been impossible essentially for the results that we see physically from what the flight data recorder was recording. Like I say, that's an area that I think deserves explanation. ... - Jeff Latas

Jeff, the Flight Data Recorder (FDR) shows the descent rate was possible, in fact Jeff, the FDR shows what happened. Jeff Latas has no clue how to comprehend FDR information, and ignores witnesses. Jeff Latas is calling those who saw 77 hit the Pentagon, his fellow Americans, liars by saying this claptrap. Why is Jeff Latas unable to figure out 911, and why is he acting like a paranoid conspiracy theorist, supporting pilots for truth lies.

And I can't think of all the discrepancies I saw, but there are several there. - Jeff Latas
Jeff Latas "can't think of all the discrepancies" because Jeff Latas is ignorant on the details, evidence, and what happened on 911. Jeff Latas, another BS artist on 911, spreading dumbed down claptrap he calls discrepancies.

After I did my own analysis ... - Jeff Latas

Where is Jeff Latas fantasy analysis posted? Is it similar to 11.2g, or 34g? Does it include a fake Vg diagram. Is it the impossible speed lie analysis.

Will Jeffery Lynn Latas publish his analysis, or is Jeff's analysis BS, big talk from pilot who can't take the time to do research.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Face with a name [View all] johndoeX Jun 2014 OP
What are these pilots claiming? Does being a pilot make their claims credible? arcane1 Jun 2014 #1
"I gave him nothing of the sort" (credibility) johndoeX Jun 2014 #2
I haven't made any claims, and you misquoted me without answering me. arcane1 Jun 2014 #3
Translation - johndoeX Jun 2014 #4
You are still avoiding my simple question: what are these pilots claiming? arcane1 Jun 2014 #5
You try to engage in a discussion with which you haven't read? johndoeX Jun 2014 #6
Nowhere in this thread did I state an opinion. Only a question. arcane1 Jun 2014 #9
Wrong arcane1 johndoeX Jun 2014 #10
yeppers! wildbilln864 Jun 2014 #16
This message was self-deleted by its author superbeachnut Jun 2014 #12
pilots for truth faces to go with the fringe conspiracy theorists spreading lies of impossible speed superbeachnut Jun 2014 #7
In other words..... johndoeX Jun 2014 #8
Faces which spread lies about 911 - unable to hit targets terrorists hit - pilots for truth superbeachnut Jun 2014 #11
Beachy, lets keep it simple.. shall we? johndoeX Jun 2014 #13
pilot for truth sources failed at physics, aero, and more superbeachnut Jun 2014 #14
Yawn... johndoeX Jun 2014 #15
Your 11.2g failed math is classic, never gets old, you still have it posted superbeachnut Jun 2014 #18
Post removed Post removed Jun 2014 #19
hmmmm.... wildbilln864 Jun 2014 #17
Faces don't help with knowledge, logic and physics superbeachnut Jun 2014 #20
Max Speed at 700' ? delphi72 Jun 2014 #21
Faces delphi72 Jun 2014 #22
faces that spread lies about the murder of thousands by 19 terrorists superbeachnut Jun 2014 #23
Jeff Latas analysis is based on failed knowledge superbeachnut Jun 2014 #24
Ross Aimer, what does he say about 911 superbeachnut Jun 2014 #25
FYI, it is not appropriate on DU to demand fellow members to reveal their real names and pictures. stevenleser Jun 2014 #26
Even if it was ok here... William Seger Jun 2014 #27
so why do you? wildbilln864 Jul 2014 #29
I use my real name because politics is my business and I want to encourage name recognition. stevenleser Jul 2014 #30
totally agree! n/t wildbilln864 Jul 2014 #31
faces talk, but offer no evidence, no proof, more woo superbeachnut Jul 2014 #28
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»Face with a name»Reply #24