Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Creative Speculation

superbeachnut

(381 posts)

7. pilots for truth fail to explain "constant MACH", they can't

Reply to johndoeX (Reply #5)

Thu Jun 26, 2014, 02:52 PM

Jun 2014

Unfortunately for Beachy, the 1.2VD requirement is based on "an increase of 20 percent in equivalent airspeed at both constant Mach number and constant altitude" - FAR 25.629 - johndoeX

Pilots for truth has no clue what this means, or how a plane can get to 1.2Vd without acceleration, in their fantasy world of 11.2g failed physics.

You can't explain this because pilots for truth have no qualified Aero Engineers.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Balsamo Busted [View all] William Seger Jun 2014 OP

Boom delphi72 Jun 2014 #1

Unfortunately, no million-dollar prize for predicting that. (n/t) William Seger Jun 2014 #10

You believe the FAA?!?!! zappaman Jun 2014 #2

Once again Seger fails comprehension. johndoeX Jun 2014 #3

oops, another Gish Gallop from pilots for truth superbeachnut Jun 2014 #4

Exactly Beachy! (sort of) johndoeX Jun 2014 #5

pilots for truth fail to explain "constant MACH", they can't superbeachnut Jun 2014 #7

I can explain it.. and I have... johndoeX Jun 2014 #8

No explanation past messing up the FAR more, on par for pilots for truth superbeachnut Jun 2014 #9

Grade A bullshit from a B-List conspriracy huckster and fraud William Seger Jun 2014 #6

For the benefit of the bamboozled William Seger Jul 2014 #11