You supported the "official story", using NIST as your illogical defense for fire destruction or something. Fire did destroy WTC 7, unless it was one of your self cleaning ovens gone wild.
WTC 7 fires were not hot according to 911 truth ... step right in.
Not hot fires. Fire good for 911 truth can't destroy buildings... oops thermal expansion, heat from fire, destroys building. oops
Sagging floors, thermal expansion, seen before in other buildings.
If WTC 7 had not collapsed, it would be unusable, destroyed, taken apart for scrape like One Meridian Plaza, in the photo. This is what WTC 7 would look like but worse, because WTC 7 was unique and had longer spans. Cherry picking NIST backed fired, and by using NIST you debunk 911 truth's silent explosives, and no product fantasy thermite scams. Was that your intention, to support the official story, and you did it very good, you said thermal expansion destroyed WTC 7, the heat supplied by fire; thus fire destroyed WTC 7.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
= new reply since forum marked as read