Creative Speculation

LOL! I loved how he talked about Rachel calling truthers loony. But I am a "no planer" kind of truther who is not nutty, and sees the same things in the towers collapse as he does. But planes also don't just glide through steel and concrete without leaving heavy debris on the ground either. Why can't he see that? Planes are "fragile" and fall apart on impacts. At least half of the "plane" IMO should have been still sticking out the building, and then fallen to the ground. What turned me into a "no planer" was this video. I was watching it one night, and thought that plane sure went in fast. Then I played with it, and if you pause it at 18 seconds in and then watch it frame by frame by clicking mouse on and off you will see what hit the towers. Where was the reconstruction of ANY plane lost on 9/11. Are we to believe that they got ALL of the DNA to identify everyone, but no reconstruction? Over 800 seats in 4 planes, where are they? Why weren't there ANY seats occupied or empty in the streets on NY? Or scattered in PA or Pentagon? Four planes with hardly any debris recovered. No questions on why what they did find wasn't reconstructed? A plane dug into the ground is hard to retrieve, but DNA is easy. I don't want to be a "no planer", but the evidence isn't there for 4 massive planes. Missiles explain the "flash" we see before the hit to be a homing device. IMO. It's hard enough to be a "truther" but even harder to be a "no planer". And why wouldn't the "terrorist" fly out of JFK? All that "planning" to have to fly over military bases because they couldn't fly out of NY. LOL! Watch the video, what do you see at 18 seconds in?