Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

wildbilln864

(13,382 posts)
18. fail!
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 07:44 PM
Mar 2014

The debris pile at Ground Zero was always tremendously hot. Thermal measurements taken by helicopter each day showed underground temperatures ranging from 400ºF to more than 2,800ºF. The surface was so hot that standing too long in one spot softened (and even melted) the soles of our safety shoes.

Professional Safety The American Society of Safety Engineers 2002-05-01 - SH&E at Ground Zero Disaster Response

also this...
1. Researchers have found iron spheres in the WTC dust. Note emphasis on iron.

2. Spheres in fly ash that have some form of iron in them are extremely rare, and fly ash "iron" spheres are actually iron-oxide spheres. Note emphasis on oxide. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016236106001906

Therefore, fly ash does not explain the iron spheres found in the WTC dust. Carbon-fueled furnaces leave oxides, in this case iron-oxide. Fire is a form of oxidation = There must have been some other source for the iron spheres.

3. The red-gray chips ignite and leave iron spheres. Again, there is elemental iron in those spheres.

Thermite leaves elemental iron. Researchers have found red-gray chips in the dust that ignite and form iron spheres, this is in fact why those people claim the chips are a form of thermite! So-far, this is the only explanation for the observed iron spheres in the dust.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

September 11 – The New Pearl Harbor [View all] damnedifIknow Mar 2014 OP
FFS will this stuff ever end? nt Logical Mar 2014 #1
With answers it will end damnedifIknow Mar 2014 #2
The answer is there! You just ignore it! nt Logical Mar 2014 #3
Not at all damnedifIknow Mar 2014 #4
The real story is boring to you, conspiracy is alway more fun! nt Logical Mar 2014 #5
Would you be open to a new investigation? damnedifIknow Mar 2014 #6
yes, but who would you trust to do the investigating? zappaman Mar 2014 #7
Many do reject the NIST version damnedifIknow Mar 2014 #8
Sure, no downside to that I agree. Unless really costly. nt Logical Mar 2014 #9
What lingering questions would those be? AZCat Mar 2014 #10
why was there molten steel & iron? n/t wildbilln864 Mar 2014 #11
You know the answer to that William Seger Mar 2014 #14
so again you'll deny what... wildbilln864 Mar 2014 #15
What I deny is their ability to identify "molten steel" by sight William Seger Mar 2014 #16
What about Janet MacKinlay? wildbilln864 Mar 2014 #17
fail! wildbilln864 Mar 2014 #18
Flail! William Seger Mar 2014 #19
So stop flailing! wildbilln864 Mar 2014 #22
Microspheres were found in all the dust William Seger Mar 2014 #23
Here are a few nationalize the fed Mar 2014 #12
Gee, it's like 2006 all over again William Seger Mar 2014 #13
Gee, it's 2014 and people keep asking questions nationalize the fed Mar 2014 #20
Gee, the people in Groundhog Day kept asking the same questions, too William Seger Mar 2014 #21
Where are the seats? Politicalboi Apr 2014 #24
There really isn't any point in this. AZCat Apr 2014 #25
"We've been through this dance before, and know what to expect." wildbilln864 May 2014 #26
Fooling anyone about what, bill? AZCat May 2014 #27
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»September 11 – The New Pe...»Reply #18