Creative Speculation

Not by any valid logic, it certainly doesn't, since that was after the events that the model was intended to study, and the reason why it didn't look like the videos is perfectly obvious once you know about the curtain wall -- which you didn't when you got yourself stuck in yet another thread that you just can't let go of. But if you think that repeating your pointless point in post after post after post will magically transform it into a valid point... nope. As many times as you care to repeat it, I'll repeat what's logically wrong with it, so suit yourself.

> Your empty claims that my points are pointless are as silly as your empty claim that, contrary to NIST's models, the interior of the building fell down leaving the perimeter columns standing.

Actually, that isn't necessarily what happened. It's possible that quite a bit of interior framing was still attached to the exterior framing when it began to fall. The important point is that the interior structure had already failed by the time we see the shell fall in the videos, and if you'll kindly READ the report, you'll see why that is NOT an empty claim. (One hint: east penthouse.)