Creative Speculation
In reply to the discussion: Bugliosi: 53 Reasons It Was Lee Harvey Oswald [View all]OrwellwasRight
(5,227 posts)At some point, you are going to get as bored of this pointless conversation as I am and you will leave me alone (or so I can only hope).
Until then, you need to look in the mirror. Why did you not address the other books I posted about (see post #128)? Why do you believe A&E is valid and Feister not? You didn't answer that, did you? Why os popular TV your source for science? You didn't answer that.
You know what, though, I don't care--I am not trying to "wear you down." Unless that implies I am trying to get you to leave me alone, which I am most certainly trying to do.
You must have a problem understanding the phrase "we draw different conclusions so why don't we leave it at that." THERE IS NOTHING IN THAT PHRASE TRYING TO WEAR YOU DOWN, nor inviting you to continue to debate me for that matter. I have not asserted the superiority of my conclusions over yours, so there is nothing to debate.
You believe Oswald killed Kennedy alone. Awesome. Please continue to enjoy that belief. It doesn't offend or harm me or threaten me. I don't care if you have it or if you don't have it.
I don't know how I can make it clearer to you that I have drawn my own conclusions on this long ago and you have zero chance of changing my mind (see post 131 for example).
And I ask you AGAIN to stop and leave me alone. SERIOUSLY. What do you not understand about invitations to end the conversation and leave me alone? (See, e.g., posts 142, 145, 149, 155, 163, 177, and 178).
Good day, sir.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):