Creative Speculation

defendandprotect

(65,605 posts)

28. The TOS needs some updating --

Reply to greyl (Reply #25)

Sun Dec 11, 2011, 02:42 PM

Dec 2011

If it's an indication of what the administratiors know now about these

subjects, they also need updating --

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

46 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Is this the chemtrails forum? [View all] Rosa Luxemburg Dec 2011 OP

I expect this is the place for chemtrails Ohio Joe Dec 2011 #1

I'm not sure. Read this snippet from the Terms of Service: freshwest Dec 2011 #2

I had not seen that... or missed it Ohio Joe Dec 2011 #3

Huh zappaman Dec 2011 #4

Pointless speculation on my part. freshwest Dec 2011 #5

No, it does not Ohio Joe Dec 2011 #6

Video must be a problem. freshwest Dec 2011 #8

Re the video: Yep, it's there. greyl Dec 2011 #9

Thanks, but my browser doesn't give me full options. I can't reduce the size. freshwest Dec 2011 #10

You can safely disregard what I said. :) greyl Dec 2011 #12

Sticky wicket. Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 #7

The way I read the TOS, chemtrail and black helicopter stuff are not permitted at all. greyl Dec 2011 #11

"those discussions cannot stray too far into Crazyland" Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 #13

Since "eg" means example, I take those to be examples of "too far into crazyland." greyl Dec 2011 #14

Bilderberg group and Trilateral Commission are real organizations covered by MSM, for god's sake! dixiegrrrrl Dec 2011 #15

I just quoted, I didn't make the rules. I edited out my own opinions. freshwest Dec 2011 #16

If they are discussed as what they really are, then they could be brought up all over DU, I'd think. Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 #17

"as what they really are" That's where I'm afraid it might get sticky. greyl Dec 2011 #18

When the REAL DU3 starts, this should be a VERY interesting group, then. dixiegrrrrl Dec 2011 #19

I had the same response when I read that Remember Me Dec 2011 #36

Chemtrails as "crazyland" --- ??? defendandprotect Dec 2011 #21

But there it is. Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 #22

Post removed Post removed Dec 2011 #23

You say "Chemtrails are not speculation." I guess they don't belong in this group then. ;) nt greyl Dec 2011 #24

True -- chemtrails are acknowledged by Congress -- defendandprotect Dec 2011 #26

You know, I was thinking about this the other day as I looked out my window Remember Me Dec 2011 #35

Unfortunately, defendandprotect no longer has posting privileges here at DU. Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 #37

Oh, that sounds like a threat Remember Me Dec 2011 #38

It's not a threat. Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 #39

"those are not the chemtrails you were looking for" dixiegrrrrl Dec 2011 #40

????? Remember Me Dec 2011 #41

Play on words, if you are a Star Wars fan. dixiegrrrrl Dec 2011 #42

Oh, well I guess I'm not ENOUGH of one. Remember Me Dec 2011 #43

Oh lord, I must have gone to the first Star Wars over 20 times. dixiegrrrrl Dec 2011 #45

These are not the DU you are looking for Capn Sunshine Dec 2011 #46

+1 RZM Dec 2011 #44

It should be. If its going to be in "offbeat" and be called "creative speculation".... napoleon_in_rags Dec 2011 #20

My reading of the TOS would allow aliens, but not alien abduction or chemtrails. nt greyl Dec 2011 #25

The TOS needs some updating -- defendandprotect Dec 2011 #28

If you feel that way, why did you agree to it? nt greyl Dec 2011 #29

"Politically unacceptable discourse" -- !! defendandprotect Dec 2011 #27

Heavy on the WOO as well! zappaman Dec 2011 #30

The world is getting heavy on the WOO stuff. I read conspiracy stuff to relax, escape. napoleon_in_rags Dec 2011 #32

Me too: "I read conspiracy stuff to relax, escape" Merlot Dec 2011 #33

Same here. napoleon_in_rags Dec 2011 #34

What, its a direct labeling of what it is. napoleon_in_rags Dec 2011 #31