Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OnTheOtherHand

(7,621 posts)
14. OK, then, your "allegedly" sounds like a "I've already made up my mind, thanks" kinda "allegedly"
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 07:05 PM
Jan 2012

Gee, this is shaping up to be useful.

Didn't think my simple questions would be so complicated to understand, especially since I said "Describe it how you would see it in an NTSB crash report."


Why would you expect anyone here to be able to describe the debris field at the level of detail of an NTSB crash report? That doesn't seem serious.

Since you described how it allegedly came in (563 mph, rolled to the right, 40 degrees), start with what part of the plane supposedly struck first and then continue from there.


Now I'm even more lost. In what respect would my speculative response to your still unexplained inquisition resemble an NTSB crash report?

If one is trying to debunk the official story, one needs to know what the official story is, agreed?


That's bizarre. Why would one be "trying to debunk the official story" without even knowing what it is? For that matter, why assume that there even is an "official story"? If you don't think what struck first can be deduced from the black box data (which, I suppose, you suspect was rigged), then why would you expect any of us to know?

It seems to me that if you were actually interested in establishing the truth about what "allegedly" happened in Shanksville, you would do your own research instead of demanding that other people do it for you. Am I wrong? If so, how?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I read this and had to think for a minute... Ohio Joe Jan 2012 #1
There were no NTSB crash reports for the 9/11 flights SlipperySlope Jan 2012 #2
The reports look pretty comprehensive to me Ohio Joe Jan 2012 #4
I didn't speculate about whether it was "reasonable", just affirmed there was no NTSB report SlipperySlope Jan 2012 #5
Giving it a quick look over... Ohio Joe Jan 2012 #7
No problem SlipperySlope Jan 2012 #8
there is also a flight path study for 93 OnTheOtherHand Jan 2012 #3
You're about halfway there. Which part struck first? What happened afterward? nt antitsa Jan 2012 #6
halfway where? OnTheOtherHand Jan 2012 #9
Halfway to what I'm asking for. =) antitsa Jan 2012 #10
"Why? Odd question to ask in the conspiracy section." OnTheOtherHand Jan 2012 #11
Yes, what happened to it after it allegedly hit. antitsa Jan 2012 #12
OK, then, your "allegedly" sounds like a "I've already made up my mind, thanks" kinda "allegedly" OnTheOtherHand Jan 2012 #14
Sounds like you're not too confident about the official story. lol nt antitsa Jan 2012 #15
way to miss the point OnTheOtherHand Jan 2012 #17
What happened to it after? jberryhill Jan 2012 #13
I don't want to guess on the story you support. Just tell me what happened. nt antitsa Jan 2012 #16
"the story you support" jberryhill Jan 2012 #18
If you don't know the details, just say so. No shame in that. nt antitsa Jan 2012 #20
Okay, so we agree on the overall synopsis jberryhill Jan 2012 #23
"beyond that, there are likely many details." <-- That's what I'm asking for. antitsa Jan 2012 #26
"afterwards"? zappaman Jan 2012 #29
Please don't troll my thread. Thanks. nt antitsa Jan 2012 #30
not trolling zappaman Jan 2012 #31
Please don't troll my thread. Thanks. nt antitsa Jan 2012 #32
not trolling zappaman Jan 2012 #33
Don't you love that "my thread" stuff jberryhill Jan 2012 #35
why can't you tell us what happened to the plane "afterward"? zappaman Jan 2012 #37
A "million pieces"? jberryhill Jan 2012 #49
I din't count them myself zappaman Jan 2012 #52
Please don't troll your own subthread jberryhill Jan 2012 #53
the plane was in the air zappaman Jan 2012 #27
Please don't troll my thread. Thanks. nt antitsa Jan 2012 #28
not trolling zappaman Jan 2012 #34
Game is at 21, right? jberryhill Jan 2012 #36
maybe the poster should ask the NTSB zappaman Jan 2012 #38
Mods, can you ban zappaman & jberryhill from this thread, please? antitsa Jan 2012 #39
Please don't troll my thread. Thanks. nt zappaman Jan 2012 #40
uhhh..I think you are mistaken in your location. dixiegrrrrl Jan 2012 #44
Thank you Dixiegrrrrl zappaman Jan 2012 #46
Can you be more specific about what is a "provocative message"? jberryhill Jan 2012 #47
Hmmmmmm zappaman Jan 2012 #48
mi enlace es su enlace jberryhill Jan 2012 #50
Hold on, let me consult my expert... dixiegrrrrl Jan 2012 #51
Welcome to DU jberryhill Jan 2012 #45
Waht happened was dixiegrrrrl Jan 2012 #19
Please don't troll my thread. Thanks. nt antitsa Jan 2012 #21
When did it become "my thread"? jberryhill Jan 2012 #22
Author: antitsa antitsa Jan 2012 #24
Just sweatin' bullets here, I assure you jberryhill Jan 2012 #25
Seems to me she answered you fine zappaman Jan 2012 #43
found something called "wikipedia" zappaman Jan 2012 #41
what do you mean by "supposedly"? zappaman Jan 2012 #42
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»This message was self-del...»Reply #14