Creative Speculation

BeFree

(23,843 posts)

16. I know =P

Reply to antitsa (Reply #14)

Sat Dec 31, 2011, 09:58 PM

Dec 2011

Some people don't. Yea, it probably was planted.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

128 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"United 93" - 2006 [View all] Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 OP

A really well-done movie. zappaman Dec 2011 #1

There are a couple of choices I don't agree with. Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 #2

Not to mention the 'German guy'.. KDLarsen Dec 2011 #4

Oh, yeah, that, too. Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 #5

I think that is the one that made me ball my eyes out. Those brave souls. applegrove Dec 2011 #3

LOL, how appropriate. The PA plane crash was Hollywood, wasn't it?! nt antitsa Dec 2011 #6

Love how the plane totally disintegrated, but one of the red bandanas wrapped around their heads... antitsa Dec 2011 #7

Nowhere does it state the bandana was worn... KDLarsen Dec 2011 #8

So that red bandana, as depicted in the movie, didn't come from the plane? nt antitsa Dec 2011 #9

you may want to re-read his post. zappaman Dec 2011 #10

Then what difference if that red bandana was actually being worn or not? antitsa Dec 2011 #11

You don't understand this statement? zappaman Dec 2011 #12

I was talking about bandanas. He seems to be talking about stuff that can float in the wind. nt antitsa Dec 2011 #13

44 people reduced to 8% of bits and pieces. One bandana survives 100% intact. Na, not planted. =P antitsa Dec 2011 #14

"Na, not planted" zappaman Dec 2011 #15

I know =P BeFree Dec 2011 #16

"Yea, it probably was planted." zappaman Dec 2011 #17

Why would they plant a bandana? That makes no sense. n/t Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2012 #50

Same reason they introduced this as if they found it at one of the scenes..... antitsa Jan 2012 #52

What? Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2012 #53

OK, armchair conspiracy planner. Glad your hindsight is 20/20. nt antitsa Jan 2012 #55

The assertion here is Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2012 #58

No, your view on this is too simplistic. I highlighted the pristine bandana because..... antitsa Jan 2012 #61

Except you have NO evidence it was planted zappaman Jan 2012 #63

"You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink." nt antitsa Jan 2012 #65

I suppose that explains why so many fans of CTs cling despite the absurdities & evidence Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2012 #68

I suppose that explains why so many fans of OSs cling despite the absurdities & evidence antitsa Jan 2012 #72

Just realized bandana wasn't planted, it was staged! antitsa Jan 2012 #18

a few problems with this reasoning OnTheOtherHand Jan 2012 #21

Guess you're assuming conspirators don't make mistakes! nt antitsa Jan 2012 #23

Yes, that has to be it! zappaman Jan 2012 #24

How many skulls of the 44 passengers were recovered? Four supposedly wrapped in red bandanas. nt antitsa Jan 2012 #25

Making things up certainly does not help your ridiculous argument. zappaman Jan 2012 #26

You misunderstood. Just stating 4 of 44 heads on board supposedly wrapped in bandanas antitsa Jan 2012 #29

questions for you zappaman Jan 2012 #32

"No skulls were found." So no 44 skulls found, but 1 bandana survived PERFECTLY intact. Hmm antitsa Jan 2012 #34

Yes, the evidence shows that nothing was malfunctioning on Flight 93 Bolo Boffin Jan 2012 #43

Then you agree zappaman was wrong? Again, why matter where bandana was on plane? antitsa Jan 2012 #45

Wrong about what? zappaman Jan 2012 #49

Why a cloth bandana have to be torn or burnt from a 600 mph fiery obliterating plane crash? Really? antitsa Jan 2012 #54

by your "logic" some of those must be faked zappaman Jan 2012 #64

spooked911 showed why all those IDs are fake...... antitsa Jan 2012 #66

How is that possible? zappaman Jan 2012 #67

Pretty funny you insult me by calling my logic 'child-like' when you missed my point! antitsa Jan 2012 #73

Only in positing that the cockpit broke up early. Bolo Boffin Jan 2012 #69

Perfectly intact from the worst of the worst kind of plane crashes when nothing else did?! nt antitsa Jan 2012 #74

And we're back at the start.. KDLarsen Jan 2012 #36

And again, what would it matter where to bandana was on the plane that supposedly antitsa Jan 2012 #39

no, I'm just pointing out problems with your reasoning OnTheOtherHand Jan 2012 #27

"I never asserted that it is impossible that the bandana was planted." Agreed! nt antitsa Jan 2012 #31

Seems a bit 'needy' canetoad Jan 2012 #19

"so-called heroics of the Flt.93 passengers"? Really? Bolo Boffin Jan 2012 #20

I know. It's like the Jessica Lynch story. nt antitsa Jan 2012 #22

If I'm going to watch fiction mrarundale Jan 2012 #28

I'm trying to decide which crater looked more ridiculous, the 'real' one, or one in movie! nt antitsa Jan 2012 #30

Do you know what the crater should have looked like? zappaman Jan 2012 #33

You skeptics have brought up a couple of comparison high-speed crashes. NONE antitsa Jan 2012 #35

Obviously you've never seen the movie. The crater's not depicted. n/t Bolo Boffin Jan 2012 #37

You're right, I was thinking of that OTHER fictional Flight 93 movie. antitsa Jan 2012 #40

No. zappaman Jan 2012 #41

Of course you don't. nt antitsa Jan 2012 #48

No, I do not agree that the real crater is "cartoon-looking." Bolo Boffin Jan 2012 #42

You've seen a plane crash crater like that before? One that also re-filled itself?! antitsa Jan 2012 #46

I didn't see anything "cartoon-like" about that depiction of the crater. Bolo Boffin Jan 2012 #70

You sidestepped my question...... antitsa Jan 2012 #75

As soon as I answer it, you'll answer mine, yes? n/t Bolo Boffin Jan 2012 #76

sure. nt antitsa Jan 2012 #77

Where I've seen a crater like that before, that filled itself in. Bolo Boffin Jan 2012 #78

You're comparing a SWAMP crash?!?!? ROFLMAO!!!! Stop with the silliness. antitsa Jan 2012 #79

a neat trick, to renege and move the goalposts in so few words OnTheOtherHand Jan 2012 #80

Only thing I'm guilty of is assuming he'd know how to compare apples & apples. nt antitsa Jan 2012 #82

What do you expect the crater to look like and why? n/t zappaman Jan 2012 #81

First I need to know how 93 supposedly crashed and what happened to it after. antitsa Jan 2012 #83

Differing stories? zappaman Jan 2012 #85

Just post the "official story." antitsa Jan 2012 #86

What? zappaman Jan 2012 #87

Can't read?: "Not going to waste time with one's that aren't relevant." antitsa Jan 2012 #88

I can read fine and know a dodge when I see one. zappaman Jan 2012 #90

"First I need" - sigh. Bolo Boffin Jan 2012 #92

It's "weak sauce" to ask for the correct OS to know what goal post to shoot at? antitsa Jan 2012 #93

It's weak sauce to promise to answer a question and then stall answering it. n/t Bolo Boffin Jan 2012 #95

What good would answering based on the wrong story? antitsa Jan 2012 #97

The question is how would YOU expect the crater to look and why. Bolo Boffin Jan 2012 #98

No I'm not. AGAIN, what good would if be if I based on a scenario antitsa Jan 2012 #100

You've reneged on your promise. Bolo Boffin Jan 2012 #102

If you told me what the correct version is and then I refused, THEN you'd be correct. antitsa Jan 2012 #103

If you had had further conditions for your answer, you should have stated them Bolo Boffin Jan 2012 #104

If I knew you guys would throw such a hissy fit, I would have. Now... antitsa Jan 2012 #105

Hissy fit? zappaman Jan 2012 #107

Why would I do any such thing? Bolo Boffin Jan 2012 #108

I'm willing to discuss too. As I've asked MULTIPLE times now, what is... antitsa Jan 2012 #110

This is really bizarre William Seger Jan 2012 #127

"...to debunk the official story, one needs to know what the official story is, agreed?" OnTheOtherHand Jan 2012 #128

If this had been an authentic discussion, he would have. greyl Jan 2012 #106

weak sauce indeed zappaman Jan 2012 #99

From a faked jetliner crash? Pretty much as depicted by the 9-11 hoaxers, lol. Their errors ... T S Justly Jan 2012 #89

Yes, it is fuckin unreal zappaman Jan 2012 #91

It didn't crash in Shanksville. nt antitsa Jan 2012 #94

Wait, what? Bolo Boffin Jan 2012 #96

still waiting zappaman Jan 2012 #101

Guess it was just another drive-by post to smear DUers, eh? zappaman Jan 2012 #109

Lol, the irony! (nt) T S Justly Jan 2012 #111

Guess we will just have to keep waiting, eh TS? LOL! zappaman Jan 2012 #112

that's pretty much the opposite of the usual complaint OnTheOtherHand Jan 2012 #44

Never heard that argument. You making things up? nt antitsa Jan 2012 #47

nope OnTheOtherHand Jan 2012 #51

Oh thanks! More proof the crash is bogus. Appreciate it! : ) antitsa Jan 2012 #56

remarkable OnTheOtherHand Jan 2012 #57

That it looks like I'm not closed minded? ; ) nt antitsa Jan 2012 #59

I know how it looks from here. Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2012 #60

Oh wow, is that your best comeback?! ROFLMAO!!!! nt antitsa Jan 2012 #62

This group is not about "comebacks." Bolo Boffin Jan 2012 #71

What a silly comment. Bolo Boffin Jan 2012 #38

The Creative Speculation group/forum is the perfect place for this crap. (nt) T S Justly Jan 2012 #84

Can someone tell me how Flight 93 supposedly crashed? antitsa Jan 2012 #113

anyone? nt antitsa Jan 2012 #114

I don't understand the question OnTheOtherHand Jan 2012 #115

Your snide remark aside, didn't see in there where is described how it crashed antitsa Jan 2012 #116

anyone? nt antitsa Jan 2012 #117

So far we got how it supposedly was when it touched the ground antitsa Jan 2012 #118

after it "touched" the ground... zappaman Jan 2012 #119

Déjà vu jberryhill Jan 2012 #120

Haven't we just danced this one before? dixiegrrrrl Jan 2012 #121

I'm starting to wonder if this poster is serious... zappaman Jan 2012 #122

hmm... dixiegrrrrl Jan 2012 #123

Is this your subthread? jberryhill Jan 2012 #124

" I paid for this microphone!!" dixiegrrrrl Jan 2012 #125

Post removed Post removed Jan 2012 #126