Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Creative Speculation

In reply to the discussion: The JFK assassination [View all]
 

Craig234

(335 posts)
17. I disagree
Sat Jul 2, 2016, 07:13 AM
Jul 2016

Let's start with the important one. You claim it doesn't matter.

It matters very much to anyone who values history. Your statement is nihilistic. If someone kills you tonight it doesn't matter who. If Obama is assassinated tomorrow, it doesn't matter who did it. Biden's president now. Forget it.

I find your position just terrible in dismissing the importance of the issue. Not only for the assassination, but it turns out that there are very important areas of our history related to the investigation, involving the CIA and military, organized crime, Cuba and more.

I thought it was a pretty popular sentiment about not understanding history and its lessons helping repeat them. Not with everyone.

Having said that and that the issue should be considered important - unfortunately, the lack of clear answers gets in the way of the lessons.

I'd say you should read the books I mentioned in the OP, but I guess not since you aren't interested.

But your lack of interests suggests you don't need to post that in the thread.

If there's a thread on some issue in some country I'm not interested in, I don't expect to post in the thread, it doesn't matter - unless there is some reason to.

As to your theory, one thing we do know is that it's not correct. I'm referring to your over-simplification, such as 'sick'.

That's a nice non-answer to the issue that doesn't really answer anything. It doesn't understand that Oswald had pursued his idea of Marxism for years, how the communist bloc views fed into his opinions, his attempted assassination of General Walker.

Your statement is like saying all we need to learn about Hitler is he was a sick guy who decided to start a war. Simple.

No need to understand anything about the political systems, the psychology of authoritarianism and terror, the role of bigotry and scapegoating in societies, the concept of genocide.

Nevemind one of the basic idea behind the European Union was to strengthen ties among European countries to help prevent any more wars after two world wars - waste of time. Hitler was a sick guy who started a war, that's all.

You are entitled not to have any interest in the topic, but that's your issue, the topic is an important one. Maybe you should be helping your children get an interest in the history instead of just saying they don't care.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The JFK assassination [View all] Craig234 Jun 2016 OP
anyone who believes the official JFK assassination story (Oswald was a lone nut) Fast Walker 52 Jun 2016 #1
This thread is not to turn into Craig234 Jun 2016 #2
where was the insult? Fast Walker 52 Jun 2016 #3
Where is the insult? Craig234 Jun 2016 #4
are you willing to learn? Fast Walker 52 Jun 2016 #5
You haven't read the book I recommended above for the lone assassin theory. Craig234 Jun 2016 #6
His murderous nature? milestogo Jul 2016 #21
I think all of those claims are incorrect. Craig234 Jul 2016 #22
Did it ever occur to you that Oswald was telling the truth? milestogo Jul 2016 #24
You need to be more honest in your discussing Craig234 Jul 2016 #26
Your arguments are basically gross generalizations or insults. milestogo Jul 2016 #27
Your post is simply a slanderous lie. Craig234 Jul 2016 #28
unless it addresses the thousands of pieces of evidence disproving the official story Fast Walker 52 Jun 2016 #7
If you wish to remain uninformed, that's your choice Craig234 Jun 2016 #8
aren't you the one remaining uninformed, if you dismiss all the conspiracy evidence? Fast Walker 52 Jun 2016 #11
That's not uninformed. Craig234 Jun 2016 #12
A few things Fast Walker 52 Jun 2016 #13
I think you have the wrong approach Craig234 Jun 2016 #14
"The evidence strongly suggests that all of the shot came from Oswald's rifle in the TBSD" ArtD48 Jun 2016 #9
The science says, all shots from the rear Craig234 Jun 2016 #10
All 40 of the medical personnel at Parkland Hospital saw an entrance wound milestogo Jul 2016 #18
I think those claims are all incorrect. Craig234 Jul 2016 #19
There are plenty of interviews on YouTube with the doctors milestogo Jul 2016 #20
We disagree Craig234 Jul 2016 #23
Oliver Stone's bullshit claims another victim William Seger Jul 2016 #15
The Zapruder film that the public saw was highly edited. milestogo Jul 2016 #25
Douglas Horne is a good example of why I no longer take JFK conspiracism seriously William Seger Jul 2016 #32
It's not complicated. It's simple alcibiades_mystery Jul 2016 #16
I disagree Craig234 Jul 2016 #17
From Tip O'Neill's book "Man of the House" (1987) dflprincess Jul 2016 #29
great post! thank you. n/t wildbilln864 Jul 2016 #30
That's part of the information Craig234 Jul 2016 #31
LOL The CIA killing ANY US Commander in Chief ANYTIME is funny and... Jeffersons Ghost Aug 2016 #33
There is a man claiming to have shot the final bullet : Edward Palamar Oct 2016 #34
The rule now is to stay with excepted facts sab390 Dec 2016 #35
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»The JFK assassination»Reply #17