Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Mira

(22,542 posts)
4. I gently suggest you start digging a little
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 09:59 PM
Mar 2015

and you will find that Flight 93 had barely a debris field at all, and the small particles of it covered a tremendous area. It has been argued that the flight was shot down from the air.
And Flight 77 is the most mind blowing deception, (other than building 7 and the 10 second free fall of two buildings designed to withstand the impact of airplanes) it had a hole in the side of the Pentagon not much bigger than 16 feet across, no outside debris at the impact zone, and no debris to speak of inside the pentagon. No luggage, no remains anywhere. When I start reading about 9/11 those are the things I find that are startling and make me want a real investigation of what happened in the worst way.

I hope I live long enough to find the answers.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

That was my very first thought as well Dixiegrrrrl Mira Mar 2015 #1
just listening SoLeftIAmRight Mar 2015 #2
The debris fields would not be remotely comparable. Thor_MN Mar 2015 #3
I gently suggest you start digging a little Mira Mar 2015 #4
I gently suggest you are attempting to compare apples, hubcaps and shampoo. Thor_MN Mar 2015 #5
I gently suggest you search a little more zappaman Mar 2015 #6
LOL! Politicalboi Mar 2015 #13
"Digging?" William Seger Mar 2015 #7
Here is what I know for certain: Mira Mar 2015 #8
That's a pretty lame excuse for posting bullshit William Seger Mar 2015 #9
Very well said Politicalboi Mar 2015 #14
I found the Snopes article pretty comprehesive jonno99 Mar 2015 #11
I don't believe that Politicalboi Mar 2015 #15
"jump the shark" William Seger Mar 2015 #18
You don't by chance jonno99 Mar 2015 #20
It is said that oftentimes we don't know what we don't know - so I ask - jonno99 Mar 2015 #19
Dropping 27,000 feet in 8 minutes is a "gradual descent"? Ghost in the Machine Mar 2015 #21
Compared to impacting the ground at a 40 degree down angle? Thor_MN Mar 2015 #22
"Controlled descent rate of 3,000 feet per minute" LOL! Ghost in the Machine Mar 2015 #23
The descent was on autopilot. Thor_MN Mar 2015 #24
It didn't crash into a reclaimed strip mine jberryhill Mar 2015 #10
Here's a picture of the crash site in 1994 Politicalboi Mar 2015 #16
While I find your use of quotation marks around "planes" intriguing... jberryhill Mar 2015 #17
Shhhhhhhh!!!!! Politicalboi Mar 2015 #12
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»Germanwings crash has a d...»Reply #4