Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Old Crank

(6,177 posts)
2. All the models have been low.
Wed Jun 18, 2025, 07:47 AM
Jun 18

One reason is that scientists want to stay conservative so that people don't call them nuts. (Hint, they already do).

They don't want to be Al Gored about no ice caps already....

This reminds me of an election about school funding in Las Vegas years ago. The Person presenting the arguement in favor of a bond for a large number of new schools was asked, why so many new schools. Can't you be conservative with your estimate. The answer was it is a conservative estimate. (Which turned out to be true and they needed even more schools.)

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Future planetary warming ...»Reply #2