Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Personal Finance and Investing

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Common Sense Party

(14,139 posts)
Sun Mar 4, 2012, 02:58 AM Mar 2012

Delaying Retirement: Why 68 Has Become the New 65 [View all]

"Not only does working longer mean more contributions and more compounding, but the longer you can defer drawing assets from your portfolio, the more you improve its longevity," says Christine Benz, director of personal finance at Morningstar...

If you're 55 or older {I think they mean younger}, you won't reach the full retirement age for Social Security benefits until age 66 1/2 or 67. So retiring at 68 or even 70 may not seem like much of a stretch.

Delaying retirement beyond your full retirement age — until you're required to take distributions at age 70 — can increase your Social Security benefits by 8 percent a year, plus these benefits are largely tax-exempt.

By retiring at age 70, you'd receive nearly double the annual Social Security as you have received if you took early retirement at age 62.


http://finance.yahoo.com/news/delaying-retirement--why-68-has-become--the-new-65-.html


Pretty difficult for many people to consider...if they don't HAVE a job, or their health won't allow them to keep working.

But if you are employed and relatively healthy, working a few more years may make sense.

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
You are not required to take SheilaT Mar 2012 #1
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Personal Finance and Investing»Delaying Retirement: Why ...»Reply #0