Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Men's Group
Showing Original Post only (View all)Time: "Women should pay more for health care" [View all]
http://ideas.time.com/2013/08/23/women-should-pay-more-for-health-care/First, lets address the obvious. Women carry and deliver babies. Maternity care is expensive, and a rising number of women are taking on these costs without the help of a husband. (Nearly half of American first-child births occur outside of wedlock.)
But childbearing is not the only reason womens health costs are higher. There are certain non-sex-related ailments that plague women with more frequency. When I sustained my second significant injury from running this year, I learned that stress fractures are more common among women. This also goes for strains and sprains. Womens bodies tend to be smaller and more prone to wear and tear.
Yet women also tend to live longer. Life expectancy for American women is 81 years, compared with 76 for men. Thats great news for women who get to enjoy more life, but its also five more years of costly doctors visits and treatments. Men have a shorter lifespan, in part because they are three times more likely to die in accidents (13 times more likely to be killed while at work) and three times more likely to be murder victims. Unexpected and sudden deaths are tragic, but they are also cheap compared with deaths due to long-term health conditions. End-of-life care can be the most expensive kind of health care, and women survive to consume more of it.
Womens greater attentiveness to their own health likely also contributes to their longevity. Pregnancy and childbearing aside, women seek preventive care and visit doctors more often. But these additional screenings cost money, and the person receiving the care should pay for it, not other members of her insurance pool (community-rated or not). After all, women may reap the benefits of this behavior by living longer lives; they should also take on the costs.
Although I think it's important to acknowledge the underlying facts she describes, I don't agree with the author's conclusion. I think the fewer rating criteria the better, and personally I think age is the only appropriate one.
Reasonable people can disagree with the appropriate solution.
It requires an odd definition of "oppression" when the oppressors agree to pay more to guarantee the longer lives of those they oppress.
15 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Having spent most of my working life as an insurance underwriter and...
TreasonousBastard
Sep 2013
#1
Who said it's a woman's issue? You seem to be leading up to saying...
TreasonousBastard
Nov 2013
#12
The entire point of health insurance -lost on many, it seems- is that the healthy pay for the sick.
Warren DeMontague
Sep 2013
#5
did you read the Time article on Health Care about, I dunno, 6 months ago?
Warren DeMontague
Sep 2013
#8
Yeah, I seem to remember seeing a non-walled version at some point, but they may have pulled it.
Warren DeMontague
Sep 2013
#10