Last week, I put out a call for more hook-up apps that are actually designed by, and for, women. Social media pro Alexandra Chong answered my call. Enter Lulu, an app so female-friendly that it doesnt even require men to create their own profileswomen do that for them.
...
Unfortunately, the creepiness of Lulu doesnt end at the bloodline. This app asks women to publicly sexualize (#KinkyInTheRightWays) and shame (#BabbyDaddy) the men in their lives without their consent. Its the textual equivalent of leaking your exs naked pics to the Internetits not wrong because its sexual, its wrong because its nonconsensual. Chong says the apps point system and preset hashtags help Lulu sidestep the negativity of its predecessors, like the rant-based Dont Date Him Girl. Lulu, she says, is a place to recommend guys rather than trashing them. But the nastiness has been curtailed just enough to prevent women from sharing crucial information (#HeRapedMe / #GaveMeAnSTD / #HasASecretFamily). All thats left is leering and negging. Any woman who's been cat-called by a stranger on the street knows this: Unwelcomed sexual commentary isn't a compliment, it's harassment. If Lulu is really a boon for men, then let willing parties create their own profiles.
At the Cut, Kat Stoeffel rightfully ridicules a group of Redditors who denounce Lulu as anti-male harassment while defending their own right to post unauthorized naked photos of women to the Internet and unleash the anonymous commentary. But these guys are half right. As one said, I wonder how society would react if I made an app that let men rate women they knew and gossip about how slutty they are." I do, too. And the next time sexual harassment goes the other way around, I expect we'll hear: "But girls are doing it on Lulu!"
http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2013/02/07/lulu_app_for_rating_men_it_s_just_as_creepy_as_rating_women.html