Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Men's Group
In reply to the discussion: 7 Signs That a Woman is Cheating [View all]4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)31. The entire thing was religious in origin
we later stripped it of it's religious basis (to some degree) while maintaining the trappings.
If you wanted to have mandatory school prayer but watered it down to "some deity of your choice" I'd still consider that inappropriate at a public school.
You want to tell people who are voluntarily entering into that civic, nonreligious arrangement, that no, they can't do it anymore, or you want to change the name.
Not at all.
They can enter in to whatever arrangement they choose.
And call it whatever they want.
People can't live together and call themselves married without a signature from the county clerk blessing their holy union? I suspect that isn't true.
That has nothing to do with "mandatory", it has nothing to do with "religious", it has nothing to do with any of that.
Government really ought to stay away from religion. Especially popular expressions of it. We don't generally have to worry about the minority religions forcing their beliefs on everyone else.
It's a goofy suggestion, and it's going nowhere. So good luck with it.
Lot's of suggestions were goofy and doomed to fail at one point.
Saying we'd have a black president was pretty goofy and impossible at one point.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
36 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

True love is impossible without a signature from the county record keeper
4th law of robotics
Nov 2012
#10
I don't agree. I think it's a fine arrangement for those who want it.
Warren DeMontague
Nov 2012
#24
Because that's a goofy suggestion, and I'm really not sure who it is supposed to benefit.
Warren DeMontague
Nov 2012
#14
I'm not for doing away with marriage, but I don't think the government should be in that business
Major Nikon
Nov 2012
#28
Honestly? Because there are tax, property advantages, it simplifies various legal matters to be
Warren DeMontague
Nov 2012
#35
if you can stand the smell, you might do the humane thing & go over post this for the freepers.
marasinghe
Nov 2012
#3
Has anyone else noticed that women almost NEVER apologize for (wrongly) attacking men?
Hemp_is_good
Nov 2012
#26