Men's Group

We see in 3D, why settle for only 2 dimensions? I have a high performance second generation 3D and find with its blu-tooth glasses and 240 frame rate delivers 3D as good as it gets, and I saw the originals in a good theater. Movies like Avatar and Hugo look amazing on 3D TV, as were done using state of the art technology. Many normal movies and shows benefit from 2D to 3D conversion done by the TV at the flick of a button, real time. Check the avsforum site-- as I agree with comments there that 240 frame rate and processing improves most all sources-- makes them clearer, smoother. The big surprise for me was what it does- amazing effects on STILL PHOTOS ! You have to see it to really understand, but it adds texture, detail, controllable depth and pop out so that relationships of image elements become more clear-- due to relief/3D and great depth,is more effective on the still image than moving. Try it on nature photos, fantasy art and ESPECIALLY GREAT ART. On a disc of Monet art the effect is startling-- the texture of brush stroke emerge, the form , volume of trees and clouds and smoke balloon up, out, back. Forms like ocean waves, smashed together in 2d, now have space, volume, depth, and a realism that clarifies the scene. I like the fact the the brain is composing depth and creating the 3D image--- you look toward the TV and the screen but the screen morphs into an expanded field- forward and back-- no longer tied to the flat panel.