Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

radicalliberal

(907 posts)
39. I composed my post in the middle of the night when I should have been in bed.
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 06:47 PM
Sep 2012

Last edited Sat Sep 8, 2012, 08:00 PM - Edit history (1)

I should have waited for the following day when my mind would hopefully be clearer.

I assure you my "alleged" former psychologist from my teenager years is quite real. He's 80 years old today. His incompetence and arrogance were truly amazing. Sadly, I was too stupid as a teenager to be able to realize that. He hurt me and my parents deeply. The group therapy incident was only one of many, and certainly wasn't the worst. I could have mentioned him by name, but I didn't care to possibly open myself up to a lawsuit.

All I was saying is that the popular culture is not friendly toward sensitive teenagers who have misgivings, if not outright convictions, about becoming sexually active. (I meant with other persons, of course. Not including masturbation.) I had no intention of defending abstinence-based sex education.

I would also observe that the local community makes a great difference in that regard. In many ways this country is quite diverse. There's a world of difference between, say, Berkeley, California, and Philadelphia, Mississippi (ugh!). They're like two different countries. But the popular culture is still national in scope.

When I referred to the exploitative quality of casual sex, I was referring only to the fact that insecure teenage girls are frequently targeted by conscienceless teenage boys who want to trick them into having sex with them. I frequently heard guys like that boast about their sexual conquests all the time as I was growing up. I got sick and tired of it. The women in my family (namely, my sister and our mother) weren't sex objects. They were both bright, intellectual women whose interests were not stereotypically "feminine." They both took principled stands against the racial discrimination of the day. My mother defied her racist, bigoted mother; and my sister was blacklisted by the John Birch Society for supporting civil rights. So, I grew up respecting women. As a college freshman in the fall of 1969, I heard a guy exclaiming how inhumane the war in Vietnam was. Then practically in the same breath, he started bragging about how he had seduced a young gal by claiming he loved her -- which, as he acknowledged in his boasting, was a complete lie. I found the clash of his professed concern over what was happening in Vietnam with the way he himself treated others to be rather galling and hypocritical, in my estimation. That is what I was referencing, and I do realize the majority of sexual encounters outside of marriage are not of a predatory nature of the kind I just described.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Did you mean "use?" Or "lose?" Behind the Aegis Mar 2012 #1
Yes I did and just fixed it. Thanks. nt Bonobo Mar 2012 #2
There's a guy in my office who taught his daughters that their vagina is called a "cookie" Papagoose Mar 2012 #3
Extremely creepy. Warren DeMontague Mar 2012 #6
Cookie Monster must have terrified them! Fearless Mar 2012 #14
Property, property, property. bemildred Mar 2012 #4
From another devil's advocate playing perspective Broderick Mar 2012 #5
looking both historically and cross-culturally your explanation, really holds no water La Lioness Priyanka Mar 2012 #9
At one time, a woman's "virtue" was her only asset lumberjack_jeff Mar 2012 #10
It's the "purity ball" mentality Warren DeMontague Mar 2012 #7
At the risk of upsetting most of the participants in this topic, regarding the issue of ... radicalliberal Sep 2012 #27
One, you lost me at "the exploitative nature of casual sex" Warren DeMontague Sep 2012 #28
Forget it. radicalliberal Sep 2012 #30
If that's what you take away from what I wrote, you're wrong. Warren DeMontague Sep 2012 #31
Sorry, Warren....but I think you overreacted there ProudToBeBlueInRhody Sep 2012 #33
Its possible. Even i am not always right, i suppose. Warren DeMontague Sep 2012 #34
I'll have more later.... ProudToBeBlueInRhody Sep 2012 #35
I composed my post in the middle of the night when I should have been in bed. radicalliberal Sep 2012 #39
Then we agree on much. Warren DeMontague Sep 2012 #40
There's no need to apologize. radicalliberal Sep 2012 #42
Everyone should be allowed the respect of self determination. lumberjack_jeff Sep 2012 #43
"First, you don't know what boasting took place the next day in the [i]girls[/i] locker room, ..." radicalliberal Sep 2012 #44
Then welcome to oddball central. lumberjack_jeff Sep 2012 #45
Describing sex outside of marriage as 4th law of robotics Sep 2012 #29
Like I said, that post lost me at "the exploitative nature of casual sex" Warren DeMontague Sep 2012 #32
Sometimes? 4th law of robotics Sep 2012 #36
I think sex is something that can be enjoyed on a number of levels, sort of like Warren DeMontague Sep 2012 #37
It illustrated the entire point of my OP perfectly. Bonobo Sep 2012 #38
Because americans are all about assets, property and value. lumberjack_jeff Mar 2012 #8
Jeff, I think this phenomena goes way beyond America or Capitalism or even Western Civilization. Warren DeMontague Mar 2012 #11
Not to this degree. lumberjack_jeff Mar 2012 #12
That was kind of the same thing I was saying. Warren DeMontague Mar 2012 #13
No offense, but this is hardly just an "American" thing...It's in every patriarchal culture whathehell May 2012 #19
I think that this message to girls Tumbulu Mar 2012 #15
It was also to insure that men were not supporting another man's child.. whathehell May 2012 #21
because if she doesnt guard it Dokkie Apr 2012 #16
Just like Jack and Jill, mama told the sailor Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #17
+1 nt Bonobo Apr 2012 #18
Great question...As a female, I often wondered about that myself and yes, it is the cause of a whathehell May 2012 #20
Except, often, it is women who are acting as the self appointed monitors of sexual purity Warren DeMontague Sep 2012 #22
For women who wish to use sex for personal gain 4th law of robotics Sep 2012 #23
Maybe, although like I said my own suspicion is that it's operating on a deeper, programmed level Warren DeMontague Sep 2012 #24
What ever it is, people seem to come by it naturally Major Nikon Sep 2012 #25
Sex with me is it's own reward. Warren DeMontague Sep 2012 #26
... Major Nikon Sep 2012 #41
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Men's Group»Why do we teach girls tha...»Reply #39