Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
4. It was not clear at all that the condom was required before the incident.
Fri Aug 24, 2012, 08:07 AM
Aug 2012

The condom negotiation occurred during the incident. The condom was then it seems used, but during sex it may or may not have broken, the woman claims it was deliberately broken.

Neither case seems to rise to the level of rape, in my opinion, but Swedish laws are very different from ours. That said, Assange seems a bit creepy, although we haven't heard his side of the story, only the bits put out by the swedish prosecutor. The obvious fact that this case is being used, whatever its merits, in a maneuver to get Assange into a situation where he can be taken by our government, makes this whole affair disturbing. And to the deniers about what is going on here, why exactly is our government taking any interest in this case at all?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Men's Group»Sexual boundaries (Yes, A...»Reply #4