Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MadrasT

(7,237 posts)
6. Actually
Mon Aug 20, 2012, 06:52 PM
Aug 2012

Two of the women's groups have nothing to do with feminism and they want to keep them that way.

The three feminist groups exist because different flavors of feminism seem to be highly incompatible.

I would like to see one women's group and one feminist group but I don't see that happening. It's like protestantism, it keeps subdividing to pacify different sects.

If anyone decided more men's groups were needed, I am pretty sure Skinner would whip them right up (if there was sufficient user demand).

P.S. Southerners are A-OK in my book.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Men's Group»Question that'll probably...»Reply #6