Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Upton

(9,709 posts)
8. Targeted for being kinky..
Tue Jul 10, 2012, 08:32 AM
Jul 2012

I'm not even sure who Meghan Murphy is, sounds like a sex negative second wave radfem, but the majority of the comments following the piece at this particular site, from women and what appears to be some men, disagree with her conclusions..For example:

Funny thing though; as well as being a feminist to the core, I like to be tied up and beaten. I have never in my life been abused, raped, or suffered any kind of sexual (or indeed non-sexual) trauma. I am not in any way mentally ill. I also enjoy tying up men and beating them. They aren't mentally damaged either. So where do these perverted desires come from? Am I a bad person because of the things I enjoy? Well according to your article and one sided, sensationalist opinions, it would seem so.


or:

As many posters have already indicated, what we do in private for pleasure has no bearing on how people govern their relationships, and govern themselves in their jobs. We have theoretically stopped discriminating on race, on sexual orientation (apparently you can be gay, just don't be kinky?) and religion. And yet, when it comes to other aspects of sexuality, this passes as acceptable and reasoned discourse? This is sophistry and rhetoric; arguments and facts twisted to make an ideological point with no reference to facts, research or statistics.


or:

I already addressed the distinction between fantasy and reality. Are there some sick people in BDSM? Of course there are - in exactly the same probabilistic distribution there are in any other random sampling of society. Brown *might* be one of them, but a feminist painting BDSM practitioners with the "you're a sicko misogynist" brush is no better than any man painting women with the "you should be in the kitchen" brush. Do you really want to lose all your progress as a feminist by indulging in the very kind of discrimination you want to see abolished?


http://rabble.ca/blogs/bloggers/feminist-current/2012/07/private-fantasy-public-reality-rcmp-bdsm-and-violence-agains

It's great to see people from the BDSM community standing up to such drivel..

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

WTF! BDSM in the RCMP? ITEOTWAWKI! [View all] Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 OP
So what is the official position on BDSM? ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jul 2012 #1
Sherlock Holmes would not approve. Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #2
In all seriousness, I read the essay posted ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jul 2012 #3
I may get into it in depth later, if I feel so inclined, but the piece itself really reads like a Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #4
That brings up a good point.. Upton Jul 2012 #7
wait... what did I miss?? opiate69 Jul 2012 #5
This Major Nikon Jul 2012 #10
Thanks, Major.... opiate69 Jul 2012 #11
I have a simple suggestion for that Major Nikon Jul 2012 #12
They took care of that discrepancy 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #13
Another thing I've noticed Major Nikon Jul 2012 #15
Yep yep yep... opiate69 Jul 2012 #16
Your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries! 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #31
lmao! exactly! opiate69 Jul 2012 #32
Here's an "even more super sexxxy picture of a woman" in her honor. lumberjack_jeff Jul 2012 #19
Odd how, in my porn-addled male gaze objectifying misogyny, I forgot to not take her seriously Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #20
"want to talk about people who can frame the economic arguments better, there's your go-to person" lumberjack_jeff Jul 2012 #21
Sounds like "nice guy" talk, Warren ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jul 2012 #22
Please, please! Allow me to mansplain! Er, sorry, explain! Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #25
Seems simple enough.... opiate69 Jul 2012 #14
Apparently, the idea that the ever-expanding list of people who've been blocked from that group Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #17
Here's my offering ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jul 2012 #24
Yep. There are a whole long list of happy, unapologetic porn people who fuck up the narrative. Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #26
speaking of Nina Hartley.. opiate69 Jul 2012 #33
Post removed Post removed Jul 2012 #36
Very confused.... opiate69 Jul 2012 #39
not very well lumberjack_jeff Jul 2012 #40
This message was self-deleted by its author Upton Jul 2012 #6
Targeted for being kinky.. Upton Jul 2012 #8
No, they are all "victims" ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jul 2012 #23
reply loli phabay Jul 2012 #37
Once again the radical left and radical right are indistinguishable from each other 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #9
I promised a bit of a breakdown on the original article, scare quotes and all, so here goes Part I: Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #18
Part II: Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #27
And, now, for the armchair psychoanalysis bit: Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #28
Very well stated, Warren. opiate69 Jul 2012 #29
It kind of reminds me of the way many closeted fundamentalists 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #30
musta hit a nerve. Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #34
Cognitive dissonance leads to denial and projection. hifiguy Jul 2012 #38
It doesn`t surprise me that this happened in Vancouver opiate69 Jul 2012 #35
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Men's Group»WTF! BDSM in the RCMP? IT...»Reply #8