As is the apparent delusion (fantasy?) that the entire edifice of penis-pleasin' patriarchal problematic pornification porny porn-porn will collapse in a dejected, dismantled heap if female ejaculation, such as it it, is shown to be the "LIE!!!!" That some demand it MUST be, because, it's in porn which means.... heteronormative dudebros like it, which means... it must be bad.
Never mind the fact that honestly I dont think too many porn viewers actually give a shit, or if they do, they really care WHAT the composition of said fluid is.
And never mind the large amount of anecdotal evidence, from many women and their partners, that something beyond mere peeing is going on here. Honestly, if it's pee it means I was peed on (or at?) at least once during college. Which is fine, I wouldnt freak out if that was the case, but .... I dont believe it was.
The fixation some have with "debunking" squirting... It's at least as weird as the fixation on the thing itself.
edited --- "issue"
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
= new reply since forum marked as read