Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Men's Group
In reply to the discussion: Why don't more men identify as liberal? [View all]Gravitycollapse
(8,155 posts)25. I'm a Freudian at heart so you have my bias.
I think this deeply embedded shame has an immense influence later on in life even if the person's thought processes have changed dramatically. Shame is an emotion and emotions are not necessarily subject to logic. They in fact resist logic rather well.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Yeah, I've noticed that DU doesn't always gel real well with the actual, objective outside Universe.
Warren DeMontague
Mar 2014
#9
Honestly, in my experience political divisions break more on geographic and religious lines
Warren DeMontague
Mar 2014
#6
I hear you. And it's a question which has been broached, in various forms, in here before I think.
Warren DeMontague
Mar 2014
#12
I suppose talking about the 80% of men who voted for Romney was accidental?
Gravitycollapse
Mar 2014
#21
To accept an ideology but refuse the name implies some sort of associational shame...
Gravitycollapse
Mar 2014
#23
Unfortunately, I think "emotional remoteness, physical violence and anti-intellectualism" is
nomorenomore08
Mar 2014
#43