Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Men's Group
In reply to the discussion: Why don't more men identify as liberal? [View all]ElboRuum
(4,717 posts)4. Possibly...
But it really wasn't my point. The Romney vote was only to highlight the greater issue, which is that of self-identification or lack thereof in men who, absent of any reason not to, still refuse to call themselves by the l-word.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Yeah, I've noticed that DU doesn't always gel real well with the actual, objective outside Universe.
Warren DeMontague
Mar 2014
#9
Honestly, in my experience political divisions break more on geographic and religious lines
Warren DeMontague
Mar 2014
#6
I hear you. And it's a question which has been broached, in various forms, in here before I think.
Warren DeMontague
Mar 2014
#12
I suppose talking about the 80% of men who voted for Romney was accidental?
Gravitycollapse
Mar 2014
#21
To accept an ideology but refuse the name implies some sort of associational shame...
Gravitycollapse
Mar 2014
#23
Unfortunately, I think "emotional remoteness, physical violence and anti-intellectualism" is
nomorenomore08
Mar 2014
#43