Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Men's Group
In reply to the discussion: If I actually thought there were "Anti-Feminists" in this group, I would kick them out. [View all]Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)23. I do have a Devil's Haircut.
Good guy, bad guy.. I can be a shithead, I'm certainly not perfect. The "MRA" thing is, really, a riot.. I mean, okaaay.

I don't mess with protected groups, either. It's a space for one thing, I respect that. On the rare occasions I post in HoF, it's certainly not to challenge the parameters of that.
That's why I'm talking about this here, and not there, for instance.
The threads you talk about; they didn't offend me, but their unfolding was fairly predictable. There is raising awareness about inherent societal unfairnesses and discrimination, and then there is criticizing groups of people for no other reason than to get a reaction- in fact, some of the people in the threads you mentioned, acknowledged that the fact that the threads got a reaction WAS THE point of the threads, in as many words.
I question how productive that sort of thing actually is, particularly when I believe most people on this site are here under genuine auspices, most people here are politically engaged Democrats- while we may not agree on everything (or even 90% of everything) we're all ostensibly on the same team, so who does the division help?

Still, like I said- a thread mentioning "white privilege" doesn't offend me, personally. A thread mentioning "male privilege" doesn't offend me, nor does one mentioning "white, male privilege". (Not even one mentioning "White male devastatingly handsome, and **** like a ***** privilege. ...Hey, what can I say?)
I appreciate your acknowledgement that certain behavior in the aforementioned thread, was over the top. I think that's the common thread with all the "time outs"- people; and I've done it myself, it doesn't mean they're "bad people"- who have lost their temper or otherwise crossed lines into personal insults. It's not about trying to silence a particular point of view.
And when people get 'offended' by a thread in GD, they usually end up kicking it and getting it more attention.. so that's not really silencing, either. I guess the long and short of it is, I don't feel that any viewpoint has really been "silenced" on DU, rather, admin has decided to try to do something about certain behaviors, not limited to any one group, which have been a long-running problem, using this sanction.
I think admin's posts- about alerts and hides since the new policy- bear out that in general, it is working.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
35 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

If I actually thought there were "Anti-Feminists" in this group, I would kick them out. [View all]
Bonobo
Jan 2014
OP
The idea that disagreeing with one or a group of feminists, makes one anti-feminist is rubbish
Major Nikon
Jan 2014
#1
I'm always amused at the "You're not doing feminism correctly" snark from certain quarters
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
Jan 2014
#2
If I had time to get bothered about every ridiculous name some random Ginkus calls me on DU
Warren DeMontague
Jan 2014
#4
As I've said before, I think we on DU generally agree on 90% of the really essential stuff.
nomorenomore08
Jan 2014
#5
For instance, if one admits that systemic racism is still a problem in this country - which is a big
nomorenomore08
Jan 2014
#7
I don't disagree with any of that. I understand perfectly well where some of these reactions come
nomorenomore08
Jan 2014
#11
Denying the mass-level effects of racism doesn't help working-class white folks in the slightest.
nomorenomore08
Jan 2014
#12
Maybe not in those exact words, but people reacting so defensively to discussions about racism
nomorenomore08
Jan 2014
#14
Social class is a vitally important distinction as well. Some downplay it far too much
nomorenomore08
Jan 2014
#19
All I'm saying is we each have to be able to articulate our reality honestly, without self-censoring
nomorenomore08
Jan 2014
#17
I think I've demonstrated my general broad support for "speaking one's mind"
lumberjack_jeff
Jan 2014
#18
And yes, harsh truth needs to balanced with a more conciliatory aspect. I don't disagree there.
nomorenomore08
Jan 2014
#20
You'll forgive me if I don't get too worked up over the "silencing" of so-called "heroes"
Warren DeMontague
Jan 2014
#21
I didn't say intaglio was a hero. He was being a complete asshole to you and that wasn't fair.
nomorenomore08
Jan 2014
#22