Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

nomorenomore08

(13,324 posts)
4. 1. Yes, but not at the expense of breast cancer funding. It shouldn't be zero-sum.
Sat Dec 28, 2013, 10:32 PM
Dec 2013

2. Perhaps, but if so the man should be stripped of all parental rights, for good. If you don't want to be a father, then fine, but you can't have it both ways. And a man in that position should also be offered a free vasectomy so it doesn't happen again.

3. I think both higher wages, and some form of gender-based corporate affirmative action, should be implemented.

4. No, unless there's a specific reason.

5. Meh... probably not. I understand the argument that women are somewhat overrepresented in higher education, but I don't see men overall as being particularly disadvantaged.

6. I don't know. No opinion on that, really, except I don't see a specific urgent need for any such thing.

7. Selling sex should always be legal (for the prostitute) but pimping and related activities should carry stiff fines and prison sentences. On the buying end, I have no particular desire to prosecute "johns" unless they knowingly buy sex with an underage or trafficked person.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Men's Group»I would like to know view...»Reply #4