Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Her Sister

(6,444 posts)
15. Thanks Mz Pip!
Mon Jul 11, 2016, 03:59 PM
Jul 2016

So am getting a few things from these passages:

He's trying to clarify classification procedures and people that can and cannot classify. HRC herself as SoS had a high enough position to be authorized.

The fact that it's not criminal but falls under an Espionage Act & therefore intention is important and must be proven. Also the fact that people not authorized to classify do so any way. And again, HRC server was not hacked unlike the gov't server/system.

Clinton, as Secretary of State, had the authority conveyed by law to make her own determination about the classification of her emails.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»Classification Law and Cl...»Reply #15